Role in People v. Michael Taylor (XNEGA111132)
As prosecuting attorney during key competency proceedings, Sharon Ransom relied upon a disputed psychiatric assessment by Dr. Pietro D’Ingillo to petition the court for defendant Michael Bernard Taylor Jr.’s forced commitment to Metropolitan State Hospital and administration of involuntary psychotropic medication. She has since ascended to the bench as a Superior Court Judge in Van Nuys (Dept. H).
Summary of Involvement
While serving as Deputy District Attorney, Sharon Ransom played a central prosecutorial role in engineering the psychiatric narrative that would be used to deprive Michael Taylor of his liberty, autonomy, and bodily integrity. She actively presented and adopted Dr. Pietro D’Ingillo’s competency evaluation as judicial gospel—despite the fact that the evaluation itself was initiated under the shadow of a sealed, unproduced order never served upon the defense.
Ransom petitioned the court not just for a 1370 commitment, but also for authorization to administer involuntary psychiatric medication, asserting that Mr. Taylor lacked capacity and posed a risk to himself and others—a position built on procedurally defective foundations.
At no point did Ransom acknowledge or challenge the fact that the evaluation she leaned upon lacked judicial transparency. Her office refused to disclose the origin or legal basis of the sealed order, reinforcing a framework of procedural darkness. She stood as the prosecutorial sword behind the State's push for incarceration-by-diagnosis, not conviction.
Since then, Sharon Ransom has been elected to the bench herself, now presiding as a Superior Court Judge in Van Nuys Court, Department H, raising larger concerns about how such prosecutorial tactics are rewarded within the very system they help to compromise.
Why She Is Defendant #6 in the Dossier:
As prosecuting attorney during key competency proceedings, Sharon Ransom relied upon a disputed psychiatric assessment by Dr. Pietro D’Ingillo to petition the court for defendant Michael Bernard Taylor Jr.’s forced commitment to Metropolitan State Hospital and administration of involuntary psychotropic medication. She has since ascended to the bench as a Superior Court Judge in Van Nuys (Dept. H).
Summary of Involvement
While serving as Deputy District Attorney, Sharon Ransom played a central prosecutorial role in engineering the psychiatric narrative that would be used to deprive Michael Taylor of his liberty, autonomy, and bodily integrity. She actively presented and adopted Dr. Pietro D’Ingillo’s competency evaluation as judicial gospel—despite the fact that the evaluation itself was initiated under the shadow of a sealed, unproduced order never served upon the defense.
Ransom petitioned the court not just for a 1370 commitment, but also for authorization to administer involuntary psychiatric medication, asserting that Mr. Taylor lacked capacity and posed a risk to himself and others—a position built on procedurally defective foundations.
At no point did Ransom acknowledge or challenge the fact that the evaluation she leaned upon lacked judicial transparency. Her office refused to disclose the origin or legal basis of the sealed order, reinforcing a framework of procedural darkness. She stood as the prosecutorial sword behind the State's push for incarceration-by-diagnosis, not conviction.
Since then, Sharon Ransom has been elected to the bench herself, now presiding as a Superior Court Judge in Van Nuys Court, Department H, raising larger concerns about how such prosecutorial tactics are rewarded within the very system they help to compromise.
Why She Is Defendant #6 in the Dossier:
- Knowingly relied on a fraudulent or undisclosed court order to commit a defendant to psychiatric incarceration.
- Pushed for forced medication of a pretrial defendant without clear statutory authority.
- Participated in the collusion between court, psychiatry, and prosecution that the Dossier seeks to expose.
- Her promotion to the bench signifies institutional reward for prosecutorial conduct that disregards constitutional protections.
> “In the courtroom of Judge Kaye, Sharon Ransom was the spearpoint of a psychiatric prosecution masquerading as legal process. Today, she wears robes—but the record bears witness to her role in the pretrial silencing of a defendant by chemical decree.”
CIVIL INDICTMENTS
- DEFENDANT #1: VERNON LLOYD PATTERSON #165016
- DEFENDANT #2: DANIELLE MARIE DAROCA-BELL #265746
- DEFENDANT #3: SUZETTE LOUISE CLOVER #89066
- DEFENDANT #4: DR. PIETRO D'INGILLO #18141
- DEFENDANT #5: RONALD OWEN KAYE #145051
- DEFENDANT #6: SHARON LEONETTE RANSOM #230371
- DEFENDANT #7: MERY ALABERKYAN
- DEFENDANT #8: DR. PHANI MADHAV TUMU #A89555
- DEFENDANT #9: MICHAEL HERMAN SALMAGGI #201301
- DEFENDANT #10: HANNAH MANDEL 333020
- DEFENDANT #11: MICHAEL DOUGLAS CARTER #152749
- DEFENDANT #12: DAVID W. SLAYTON
- DEFENDANT #13: KATHRYN ANN BARGER-LEIBRICH
- DEFENDANT #14: RICARDO DANIEL GARCIA #178111
- DEFENDANT #15: STEPHANIE CLENDENIN
- DEFENDANT #16: DR. MICHAEL BARSOM
- DEFENDANT #17: DR. KORY KNAPKE #A49908
- DEFENDANT #18: SERGIO TAPIA 2 #185836
- DEFENDANT #19: ASHFAQ GANI CHOWDHURY #243763
- DEFENDANT #20: GEORGE GASCÓN #182345
- DEFENDANT #21: RON ANDRES BONTA #202668
- DEFENDANT #22: MARK RICHARD HARVEY #155618
- DEFENDANT #23: GRANT PARKS
- DEFENDANT #24: GAVIN CHRISTOPHER NEWSOM
- DEFENDANT #25: RONALD DION DESANTIS #15976
- DEFENDANT #26: SYDNEY KAMLAGER-DOVE
- DEFENDANT #27: ERIKA ANZOÁTEGUI #187012
- DEFENDANT #28: MARILYN E. BEDNARSKI #105322
- DEFENDANT #29: BARRET STEPHEN LITT #45527
- DEFENDANT #30: DAVID SEAN MCLANE #124952
- DEFENDANT #31: KEVIN JAY LAHUE #237556
- DEFENDANT #32: LINDSAY BROOKE BATTLES #262862
- DEFENDANT #33: LAURA FRANCES DONALDSON #307638
- DEFENDANT #34: RODRIGO ISMAEL PADILLA HERNANDEZ #339523
- DEFENDANT #35: JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR.
- DEFENDANT #36: DONALD JOHN TRUMP
- DEFENDANT #37: ERIKA KIRSTEN LEIGHTON DOHERTY #283026
- DEFENDANT #38: NATHAN JOSEPH HOCHMAN #139137
- DEFENDANT #39: FRANCES ROTHSCHILD #39602
- DEFENDANT #40: PATRICIA GUERRERO #190834
The Vernon Patterson Dossier
- Exhibit A-1 (4/8/25): [EMAIL] Vernon Patterson Admits No Court Order for PC 730 Competency Assessment
- Exhibit A-2 (5/8/25): [SMS] Vernon Patterson Dismisses Due Process While Presuming Client's Guilt
- Exhibit A-3 (5/12/25): [SMS] Vernon Patterson Declares Unlawful State Hospital Commitment a “Non-Issue”
- Exhibit A-4 (5/13/25): [SMS] Vernon Patterson Denies Relevance of Missing Court Order While Scheduling New Competency Exam
- Exhibit A-5 (5/14/25): [COURT ORDER] Vernon Patterson Materializes Threat to Re-Evaluate Defendant Without Correcting Prior Fraud
- Exhibit A-6 (5/15/25): [SMS] Defendant Rejects Unlawful Psychiatric Evaluation; Patterson Refuses to Answer Jurisdictional Challenge
- Exhibit A-7 (5/23/25): [SMS] Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence
- Exhibit A-8 (5/28/25): [SMS] Defendant Demands Consent Waiver and Dismantles Cover-Up
- Exhibit A-9 (6/3/25): [EMAIL] Vernon Patterson’s Constructive Abandonment and Weaponized Incompetency Allegations
- Exhibit A-10 (6/23/25): [SMS] Vernon Patterson Folds! Withdraws Representation Without Due Process
- Exhibit B-1 (10/2/23) [SMS] Judge Suzette Clover Appoints Dr. Pietro D’Ingillo As Confidential Expert for Mental Health Diversion (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- EXHIBIT B-2 (2/14/24) [EVALUATION] Unauthorized Competency Report Submitted in Violation of Court Order and Statutory Privileges (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- EXHIBIT B-3 (2/14/24) [MINUTE ORDER] Unauthorized Invocation of PC §1368 and Retroactive Justification of Prior Evaluation (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit B-4 (2/28/24) [MINUTE ORDER] Appearance Waived, New Judge Assigned, Competency Hearing Continued W/O Jurisdictional Clarity (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit B-5 (5/1/24) [EVALUATION REPORT] Defendant Withholds Consent Pending Constitutional Challenge — Evaluation Aborted (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit B-6 (6/21/24) [EVALUATION REPORT] Defendant Refuses Evaluation Until Prior Due Process Violation Is Cured — No Opinion Rendered (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit B-7 (8/30/24) [EVALUATION REPORT] Involuntary Medication Order Recommended Solely on Records and Prior Contested Evaluation (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit B-8 (8/30/24) [MINUTE ORDER] Judicial Authorization of Forced Medication, Voter Disqualification, and Broad HIPAA Disclosure Without Procedural Redress (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit B-9 (5/14/24) [COURT ORDER] Court Authorizes Confidential Psychiatric Evaluation at Defense Request Following Accusations of Constructive Abandonment and Due Process Violations (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit C-1 (4.28.24) [COMPLAINT] Material Falsehoods & Constructive Ratification by The California State Bar (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit C-2 (3/20/24) CJP Complaint on Judge Clover (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit C-3 (3/18/25) [EMAIL] DSH Engages In Constructive Ratification of Fraud by Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit C-4 (5/15/25) [EMAIL] Sydney Kamlager-Dove Engages In Constructive Abandonment of Constituent Amidst Judicial Fraud (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit C-5 (4/8/24) [EMAIL] The Cochran Firm Declines Representation; Mandatory Reporting Duties Still Implied (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit C-6 (5/18/25) [EMAIL] ACLU of Southern California – Declination, Constructive Notice, and Failure of Mandated Reporting Duties (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit C-7 (6/10/25) [EMAIL] Judicial Acknowledgment of Fraud Upon The Court By 2nd Appellate District Court of California (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit C-8 (6/15/25) [EMAIL] Trump's DOJ Endorses Constructive Judicial Misconduct That Originated Under Biden (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit C-9 (6/22/25) [EMAIL] Congresswoman Judy Chu Receives Formal Complaint of Fraud Upon The Court After DOJ Closed Complaint (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit C-10 (7/1/25) [LAWSUIT] California Attorney General Rob Bonta Violates Equal Protection of Defendant Michael Taylor (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Suspects
- Suspect #1: BRANDON STALLINGS #263244
- Suspect #2: TANI GORRE CANTIL-SAKAUYE #114470
- Suspect #3: BEATRIZ TAPIA
- Suspect #4: ANDREW SAGAN
- Suspect #5: CONSUELO MARIA CALLAHAN #65370
- Suspect #6: DARBY DICKERSON
- Suspect #7: CHARLES F. ROBINSON
- Suspect #8: MARK T. HARRIS #111213
- Suspect #9: PAMELA JO BONDI #886440
- Suspect #10: ANAHITA SEDAGHATFAR #217289
.png)
Comments
Post a Comment