The Daroca-Bell Dossier: Exhibit #3 "Daroca-Bell Resists Equal Protection Rights of Client Michael Taylor" (June 12th, 2023 thru August 11th, 2023)

Posted by on

Uploaded Image

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
date: Jun 12, 2023, 12:08 PM
subject: RE: Michael Taylor
mailed-by: gmail.com

Good afternoon, Ms. Bell

Michael Taylor here. Just following up with you after getting your email from Linda. Can you please give me a call at your best convenience?

Thanks

Michael Taylor
213.561.0554

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jun 13, 2023, 1:41 PM
subject: RE: Michael Taylor
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

Hi Mr. Taylor- 

So nice to hear from you. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. Thank you so much for reaching out. I’m working to get up to speed on the cases I received as quickly as I can. My goal is to call you by the end of the week to discuss your case. I’m hoping to call you sometime Thursday afternoon. Please let me know if that works for you. 

Thank you,
Danielle

🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
date: Jul 30, 2023, 10:18 PM
mailed-by: gmail.com

Ok now I might not be important to tha world in your view. But I really don't think my position concerning so-called equal protection is far fetched.

I mean, what this prosecutor's office is doing to me is almost no different than what tha federal government is doing with Trump in contrast to Biden. Weaponizing institutions against people it doesn't like!

And for what!? The case should be thrown out for tha simple fact that there is no lawful justification for responding with violence to a traffic infraction.

If there is no excuse to not know tha law, why is this being overlooked?

Why are every single one of my viable legal defenses overlooked and downplayed like tha book doesn't fucking say it!? I didn't write or prescribe tha penal code. Why should I respect your profession if your whole strategy is just a game of charades?

You guys make arrogant assumptions all day long because you deal with defendants who think they know better than you. But when you get a defendant who makes a sound legal argument, you wanna act like I can't figure this out on my own.

Why does any state prosecutor have so-called powers to prosecute pure speculation over hard evidence? Why does a prosecutor have discretion to break tha very law we are all held to, in order to criminalize peaceful citizens!?

There is no case here. They have all just been wasting my fucking time!

Because if you think you can break tha law to enforce it against me, that is perceived hostility. I am a citizen of tha United States. I wasn't even a California resident when this incident took place. And this gross violation of my civil rights is producing heinous circumstances for me alone.

I hate this fucking country because of people like you. Because you betray my trust! Because everyday I wake up to do tha right thing and you fucking insult me by tha idea of creating a criminal out of me. Ya fucking bitches!

Drop this fucking case!

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
date: Jul 30, 2023, 10:22 PM
subject: Re: Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.
mailed-by: gmail.com

Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.

Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.

Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.

Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
date: Aug 1, 2023, 9:35 AM
subject: RE: Re:
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

Mr. Taylor,

When we emailed last week, I advised you that I had reached out to the DA about meeting with him regarding your case. I’m very sorry that this case causes you so much distress and I want to see a fair resolution for you. Linda and I will call you tomorrow afternoon so we can discuss your issues with this case.

Again, Mr. Taylor, I am working on your behalf to resolve your case. I don’t appreciate your language. I look forward to speaking with you tomorrow.

Danielle Daroca Bell

🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 10, 2023, 7:36 PM
subject: Meeting Today
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

Hello Mr. Taylor,

As promised, I did meet with the assigned Deputy District Attorney today regarding your case. I laid out all of the strengths of your case and pointed put the weaknesses in theirs. He agreed that their case has some issues in terms of proving the charge, however, he has ultimately decided that he will not be dismissing the case.

I think that Mental Health Diversion is an option for resolution. Mental Health Diversion is a 2 year program which would require you to participate in some type of mental health services for a 2 year period. Once the two year period is up, as long as you are in compliance with treatment and have obeyed all laws, the court will dismiss your case. Mental health diversion does not involve a guilty or no contest plea and you would maintain your not guilty plea for the duration of the diversionary period. Mental health diversion requires that I file a motion with the court and the court would have to grant the motion to allow you to participate in treatment, but I do believe it’s a viable option in your case if you’d like to pursue it.

Finally, if you are not interested in a resolution of your case by way of mental health diversion or some other plea agreement, then we would set the case for jury trial. I would be representing you at the jury trial where 12 people from the community would serve as jurors, listen to the evidence in the case and decide whether you are guilty or not guilty. I believe you have a viable defense to these charges and would be prepared to argue as such to the jury. If you are found guilty after trial, the court would sentence you.

I look forward to hearing from you with regard to the above and hope we can discuss your options. Your next court date is 8/23/23.

Sincerely,

Danielle Daroca Bell she/her/hers
Deputy Public Defender
300 E. Walnut St., Ste 311
Pasadena, CA 91101
Office: (626) 356-5471
Main: (626) 356-5481

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 10, 2023, 8:04 PM
subject: Re: Meeting Today
mailed-by: gmail.com

We will argue equal protection on August 23rd. 

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 10, 2023, 8:10 AM
subject: Full Brief
mailed-by: gmail.com

I ain't taking backseat to anybody today. I want a full briefing before 4p.

Thank you for understanding. 

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
cc: Linda Eby <LEby@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 10, 2023, 8:48 AM
subject: RE: Full Brief
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

Mr. Taylor,

I will give you a full briefing of my meeting with Mr. Park as soon as I am able. That might be tomorrow. I realize this is upsetting to you, but before 4 is not possible for me. I have back to back meetings this afternoon. As soon as my schedule permits, I will discuss this with you. Thank you for understanding.

Danielle

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 10, 2023, 8:53 AM
subject: Re: Full Brief
mailed-by: gmail.com

Or you can record it on voice record and send me a copy. I don't have time for any of this! When your rights are violated it's not business as usual.

Record the meeting please thank you. I want to hear what is discussed how it's discussed and why it's discussed. I want full transparency if I am obligated to trust you.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 10, 2023, 10:57 AM
subject: Re: Full Brief
mailed-by: gmail.com

If I'm expected to act cordial and professional throughout this process, how come my public defenders can't just admit to me that I'm right about my concerns for equal protection? Whether we argue it or not in court, why can't you give me credit when I'm actually right? And why would you assume I'm not insulted or offended by being gaslighted, steamrolled, and outright ignored every time I have a valid point to make?

Why does it mean so much more to you to steamroll defendants on their cases?

Either we're governed by law and order or by prejudice and emotion. You decide.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 10, 2023, 11:50 AM
subject: Re: Full Brief
mailed-by: gmail.com

If a prosecutor in California refuses to respect the equal protection rights of defendants, it could potentially raise legal and ethical concerns. Defendants and their legal representatives have the right to raise such issues in court and challenge any actions or decisions that appear to violate equal protection principles. The court system should provide a mechanism for addressing such disputes and ensuring that defendants' constitutional rights are upheld. This might involve filing motions, presenting evidence, and arguing the case before the judge. Ultimately, the court's decision will depend on the specifics of the situation and the interpretation of applicable laws.

🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 11, 2023, 8:29 AM
mailed-by: gmail.com

Explain to me how this is not an equal protection issue please. In thorough detail.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 11, 2023, 8:39 AM
subject: Don't Make Me Wait For Answers
mailed-by: gmail.com

Please explain to me how this is not an equal protection issue, since you won't argue why it is.

I think I'm correct but your supervisor won't permit you to defend my civil rights just bc you're not private lawyers. But to assert that only private lawyers defend civil rights is a red flag

Explain how and why equal protection doesn't apply to my case because right about now I think I know better than you do

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 11, 2023, 9:01 AM
subject: Re: Full Brief
mailed-by: gmail.com

Please explain to me why we can't make an argument for violation of my equal protection rights?

Is Equal Protection not a part of due process?

Explain to me how equal protection isn't in both tha California and Federal Constitutions.

Explain!!!!!!!!!!!

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 11, 2023, 10:43 AM
subject: RE: Full Brief
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

Mr. Taylor,

I know that Mr. Le explained this to you many times before. Equal Protection is not a plausible defense argument against the charges that have been brought against you. Although you see yourself (and I see you) as a victim in this incident, the District Attorney’s office does not necessarily view the evidence the same way. They believe that you intentionally ran over the complaining witness causing his injuries. I don’t believe that. I believe this was an accident and your reaction to a very frightening scenario was reasonable. In my opinion, anyone in that same situation would have been terrified at a man coming to the driver’s side door and breaking the window and would have tried to get out of the situation as quickly as possible. However, the DA is open to interpreting the evidence as they see fit and, in this case, unfortunately, they do not view it the same way as we do. That’s why you have the opportunity to fight your case, and ultimately, if you decide to do so, argue the case to the jury.

Equal protection is an argument made for a protected class of individuals. You have not been deprived of due process as this is what this court proceeding is. You have due process under the law meaning you have the ability to fight your case, have counsel, explore defenses, etc. Not only does qual protection not fit here legally, in my opinion, it is not the argument that leaves you with the best chance of prevailing against these charges.

As I explained in my email last evening, you have some options here, and I’d like to discuss them with you. I will be out of the office on a personal matter until Thursday, August 17, 2023. I look forward to speaking to you next week. Furthermore, you are always welcome to come to court on 8/23/23 if you wish.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,
Danielle Daroca Bell

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 11, 2023, 11:22 AM
subject: Re: Full Brief
mailed-by: gmail.com

What do you mean Equal protection is for a "protected class" exactly? That is just not how it is spelled out in tha Legislature.

So if equal protection is a protected class, then you admit I don't have protection, right?

The prosecutor can think whatever he or she wants but that doesn't mean their discretion should allow them to try defendants prejudicely. And with my car being stolen and tha court helping it happen, I don't think you guys quite understand what you're doing to me.

To be tried exclusively for me being attacked. I'm sorry but I do not agree with tha terms of California court. I do not agree nor consent because regardless of how you guys want to interpret tha law, it is causing serious emotional and psychological harm to me on a daily basis and I am now subject to have an absolute meltdown over this. This country has lost it's way.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 11, 2023, 1:51 PM
subject: Re: Automatic reply: Full Brief
mailed-by: gmail.com

If you cant convince one person to dismiss tha charges like a good person should, how can I trust you to represent me before 12 people?

On Sun, Aug 2, 2026, 10:47 PM Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com> wrote:

Uploaded Image

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 24, 2023, 9:09 AM
subject: Dismissal
mailed-by: gmail.com

I cannot understand for tha life of me why you and tha court have to waste my time with this bullshit case.

As an American citizen, I have a right to equal protection of the laws. Period. Therefore, tha prosecutor has no case!

And as a public defender, that's a great defense because you are defending my constitutional rights.

Just because you don't want to take that option does not mean it isn't valid. And it shouldn't take months of court dates to try and get just one count removed. This whole case could've taken one meeting to dismiss this whole case. And now, you are working with them and against me as this entire ordeal has left me completely fucked off out here!

The DA and detectives are just mad that I didn't incriminate myself because they don't want to see a European lose to a black man. But, what kind of message is that? They cannot weaponize tha office of tha district attorney against it's own citizens and yet here you are refusing to reach out to Gascon on my behalf as if it would hurt my case.

I seen all tha countless cops named in my case. They want to see me convicted even if it's tha wrong thing to do. And you're helping them without incriminating yourself. Public defenders don't defend tha public. Instead, you help tha prosecutor NOT LOSE.

There's no way to justify public defenders not directly attacking tha prosecutor's arguments. None. And as a Man who has his own sense of justification, I care nothing about policy or what your boss told you to do. That means absolutely nothing to me. The only thing that matters right now is my so-called constitutional rights being respected and honored. What I am asking is not even too much.

The court, the county, city of Glendale, police, have all profited off my current disposition. This is an injustice. And it doesn't matter what you guys think. Only what can be proven. And it can be proven that I have civil rights and that those rights have been violated by all parties in this case... including you, Mr. Le. Yes.

The dad had tha first opportunity to contact emergency and render aid, but instead took tha law in his own hands and tried to break an entering into my vehicle while I was occupying it. I've committed no crime here! And by tha court revoking my driving privileges, they have effectively joined tha prosecutor in tha violation of my constitutional rights.

Why should my rights be violated before I can prevent it from happening?

I know one thing for 100% certain. I will not be going to prison nor will I be staying in California for any program mental health or otherwise.

If they're going to violate my rights, then they may as well renounce my citizenship in this country.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 24, 2023, 10:12 AM
subject: RE: Dismissal
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

I have addressed these issues with you previously and on multiple occasions. The Judge in Dept. H also addressed these concerns that you have when you requested a hearing to have me removed as your counselor, and when you were considering going pro per. I have met the DA Head Deputy Teresa Gomez and presented things in mitigation previously and submitted all the things that your friends submitted to me. I asked her to dismiss the case. She was not willing to do that. Due to what I observed when you addressed the court and was considering going pro per I believed that your mom’s substance abuse while pregnant with you has possibly affected your brain function. If so I believe this to be possibly relevant in your defense, and is certainly mitigation. I have explained that there is a new DA assigned your case now, and that I would like to work everything up to present to him and once again ask for a dismissal. He will have to address it with his supervisor, but I feel that he is a lot more reasonable than the previous DA. I have followed up with Dr. Kowell to get me a report as soon as possible. I have tried my best to assist you.

🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
cc: Noah Cox <NCox@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
date: May 1, 2023, 10:36 AM
subject: RE: Failure
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

Mr. Taylor,

I’ve explained to you multiple times why I had put the matter over. There is an expert evaluation that is pending that is relevant to your defense. My supervisor has reassigned your case to an attorney from my office whose name is Noah Cox. I have ccd him to this e-mail. His phone number is 323-393-0497. You can call or text him at that number. Your next court date is 5/16/23 in Dept. F. You should be there unless you make arrangements with Mr. Cox for him to appear on your behalf without you being present.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: May 1, 2023, 10:40 AM
subject: Re: Failure
mailed-by: gmail.com

This is a case involving my life. Your supervisor doesn't make such a decision without consulting me. I will be representing myself going forward.

Waiting to hear from you Monday morning just reaffirms my suspicions. I'm an entrepreneur in every sense of tha word. And if there's a deal to be made, I will broker it myself.

California will not make decisions on my behalf FOR me. I am a sovereign citizen of the United States. The state has no right to violate my rights. Period.

Thanks for wasting this much of my time.

🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Linda Eby <LEby@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jun 2, 2023, 11:57 AM
subject: new attorney
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

Danielle Daroca Bell

Kind Regards,
Linda Eby
Paralegal

Pasadena Branch
Los Angeles County Office of the Public Defender
300 E Walnut Street 3rd Floor Suite 311

Pasadena, CA 91101
Ph: 626-356-5473
Fax: (626) 793-9799

On Sun, Aug 2, 2026, 10:36 PM Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Aug 2, 2026, 10:23 PM
Subject: The Daroca-Bell Dossier: Exhibit #1 "Christian Le Acknowledges Right to Self Representation But Not The Right To Equal Protection" (August 18th, 2022 thru March 3rd, 2023)
To: <wb100music.epost@blogger.com>, <DistrictDefender911.epost@blogger.com>, <Districtdefender911.vernypatty@blogger.com>

Uploaded Image

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 18, 2022, 9:18 AM
subject: Re: Defense
mailed-by: gmail.com

To explain or even defend myself against these allegations inadvertently gives credibility to them. There needs to be an honest narrative on this case. The simple truth. I have no time for any idiot whatsoever that wants to act or believe like I cant speak to help myself. I told you what happened, if they don't "want" to believe me, then why should I respect their stance?

If we were to run thru this incident in order of events, it would, by legal definition, make me tha victim. I never committed a crime. To say I was angry is 100% complete speculation. But, we have all tha evidence necessary to prove that not only did Yaghoubov commit a crime, but acted in a way that is unlawful, put the public in danger, and his SPECIFIC ACTIONS are not protected by tha constitution. The same constitution that gives me a right to due process.

My question is this. If our state constitution says that we have a right to due process (which tha court clearly honors outright) and in tha same paragraph states that a person may not be denied equal protection of tha laws, how can they press charges on me based on assumptions when evidence clearly reveals tha man committed a malicious and intentional crime? How?

How does tha court pick and choose what they are going to honor on behalf of tha law they wrote? I'm going to represent myself because tha prosecutor will have to go thru me personally as I do not respect their stance nor do I approve of their abuse of power.

Now, it's no secret that, as a public defender, you're not going to attack tha DA's argument where it counts. I'm not going to spend all these court dates explaining so-called facts on tha record. I will state tha law on tha record in court at trial. I will be stating tha law! And if that is something you're unwilling to do then you don't have to be my lawyer.

I tell you this respectfully, with acknowledgements to your efforts and contributions to my cause. If it's unethical for me to meet with the prosecutor at a chance to liberate myself then why should I leave them to you? They cannot hide behind a public defender. In tha end, I won't have to explain my actions as evident as it seems. But, they'll have to answer for defending and justifying a repeat criminal offender before this case can be eligible for a trial. Why should I settle for testifying? I'd only be able to address questions they ask me. But, if I represent myself, I can say what needs to be said.

Fact of tha matter is, I can't trust a lawyer let alone a public defender who has any other cases against tha same prosecutors. It places severe limits on what you could actually do for me. Kinda feels like you're defending tha prosecutor's office tha way you refuse to make a legal based argument. Making fact based arguments during pretrial will only help move this along to trial. And as far as I'm concerned, this case is ineligible for trial. You can't defend a criminal and press charges on tha victim. Just because you incur injury in tha commission of a crime, doesn't make you any less liable for that crime. Calcrimm can suck it, it won't be necessary. 

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 18, 2022, 9:29 AM
subject: RE: Defense
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

You have definitely put a lot of thought into this decision. Representing yourself is a decision you are Constitutionally allowed to make and do. Going pro per will allow you to talk directly to the court and prosecutor. I have tried my best to explain the legal process to you.

🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 3, 2022, 1:19 PM
subject: What if
mailed-by: gmail.com

Good afternoon, Mr. Le.

Quick question. For tha sake of argument, who's to say these guys didn't plan and plot to victimize somebody in that parking lot considering his interactions with the subjects before I arrived?

I feel like these charges are racially motivated because after all, this was two Armenian Men in Glendale against a Black man so that's why everything has been unfair. Even if they want to try me, they'd have to press charges on tha other two since it can be argued that all of us put the public in danger. Otherwise, this is surely a violation of my rights and an equal protection issue.

It's not right to file charges against me just because I'm who they'd rather believe is guilty. This is not right nor is it in tha interest of justice. There's too high a risk they are penalizing tha true victim in this case. Using speculation as a means to overlook tha malicious intent of two Armenian Men in Glendale against a peaceful citizen sounds like racial discrimination to me. That's tha only reason why this whole case is "fucked up". These charges are unethical.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 4, 2022, 8:55 AM
subject: RE: What if
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

Lets touch bases before noon today. I will give you a call when I am done w/ court.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 4, 2022, 9:50 AM
subject: Re: What if
mailed-by: gmail.com

Ok. Take your time. Call me at your earliest convenience. I'll be available.

Thanks

🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 2, 2023, 12:33 PM
subject: Re:
mailed-by: gmail.com

Good afternoon, Mr. Le.

Can you tell me what happened in court yesterday when the judge called you and tha prosecutor to her chambers?

What's going on with this case?

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 2, 2023, 1:49 PM
subject: RE: Re:
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

She wanted to give the DA a background of the case outside the presence of Michael’s parents. Basically said that the parents come every time, and has gotten into it with you at times so that’s why they are seated in court. She put the blame more so on them for getting into it with you. She also let the DA know that Michael Y. seemed like he had problems that day, and initiated what happened. She is encouraging us to resolve it. I asked the DA to review the file from our perspective, and dismiss the attempted murder outright.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 2, 2023, 2:28 PM
subject: Re: Re:
mailed-by: gmail.com

And what are we doing about the hit & run charges?

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 2, 2023, 2:41 PM
subject: Re: Re:
mailed-by: gmail.com

If we want to be technical, Michael Y.'s father had the first opportunity to render aid and/or contact emergency but instead took matters into his own hands and compelled me to flee. How are we dealing with that?

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 3, 2023, 9:37 AM
subject: RE: Re:
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

You have pled Not Guilty to those charges. We will be going to trial on those charges. I am trying to get them to dismiss the most serious charges b/c they were willing to do that if you were going to take a deal where you had to plead no contest. I asked the new DA to dismiss the attempted murder b/c it was an accident.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 3, 2023, 9:39 AM
subject: RE: Re:
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

I gave you a copy of the CALCRIM instruction for the hit and run charge and attempted murder charge. I also went over it with you. That’s how we are dealing with it. By negating one of the elements. Have a good weekend Michael.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 3, 2023, 9:49 AM
subject: Re: Re:
mailed-by: gmail.com

I'll have to represent myself at trial. That's a promise.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 3, 2023, 9:57 AM
subject: RE: Re:
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

That is your constitutional right to do so Michael.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 3, 2023, 10:26 AM
subject: Re: Re:
mailed-by: gmail.com

This tha bullshit I'm talking about.

You gon tell me it's my constitutional right to represent myself yet you don't even acknowledge my constitutional right to EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.

You're fucking fired, my friend.

The Daroca-Bell Dossier

Offical Podcast of Mistah Wilson

Comments

Post a Comment

Full Archive

Show more