The Daroca-Bell Dossier: Exhibit #1 "Christian Le Acknowledges Right to Self Representation But Not The Right To Equal Protection" (August 18th, 2022 thru March 3rd, 2023)


Uploaded Image

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 18, 2022, 9:18 AM
subject: Re: Defense
mailed-by: gmail.com

To explain or even defend myself against these allegations inadvertently gives credibility to them. There needs to be an honest narrative on this case. The simple truth. I have no time for any idiot whatsoever that wants to act or believe like I cant speak to help myself. I told you what happened, if they don't "want" to believe me, then why should I respect their stance?

If we were to run thru this incident in order of events, it would, by legal definition, make me tha victim. I never committed a crime. To say I was angry is 100% complete speculation. But, we have all tha evidence necessary to prove that not only did Yaghoubov commit a crime, but acted in a way that is unlawful, put the public in danger, and his SPECIFIC ACTIONS are not protected by tha constitution. The same constitution that gives me a right to due process.

My question is this. If our state constitution says that we have a right to due process (which tha court clearly honors outright) and in tha same paragraph states that a person may not be denied equal protection of tha laws, how can they press charges on me based on assumptions when evidence clearly reveals tha man committed a malicious and intentional crime? How?

How does tha court pick and choose what they are going to honor on behalf of tha law they wrote? I'm going to represent myself because tha prosecutor will have to go thru me personally as I do not respect their stance nor do I approve of their abuse of power.

Now, it's no secret that, as a public defender, you're not going to attack tha DA's argument where it counts. I'm not going to spend all these court dates explaining so-called facts on tha record. I will state tha law on tha record in court at trial. I will be stating tha law! And if that is something you're unwilling to do then you don't have to be my lawyer.

I tell you this respectfully, with acknowledgements to your efforts and contributions to my cause. If it's unethical for me to meet with the prosecutor at a chance to liberate myself then why should I leave them to you? They cannot hide behind a public defender. In tha end, I won't have to explain my actions as evident as it seems. But, they'll have to answer for defending and justifying a repeat criminal offender before this case can be eligible for a trial. Why should I settle for testifying? I'd only be able to address questions they ask me. But, if I represent myself, I can say what needs to be said.

Fact of tha matter is, I can't trust a lawyer let alone a public defender who has any other cases against tha same prosecutors. It places severe limits on what you could actually do for me. Kinda feels like you're defending tha prosecutor's office tha way you refuse to make a legal based argument. Making fact based arguments during pretrial will only help move this along to trial. And as far as I'm concerned, this case is ineligible for trial. You can't defend a criminal and press charges on tha victim. Just because you incur injury in tha commission of a crime, doesn't make you any less liable for that crime. Calcrimm can suck it, it won't be necessary. 

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Aug 18, 2022, 9:29 AM
subject: RE: Defense
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

You have definitely put a lot of thought into this decision. Representing yourself is a decision you are Constitutionally allowed to make and do. Going pro per will allow you to talk directly to the court and prosecutor. I have tried my best to explain the legal process to you.

🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 3, 2022, 1:19 PM
subject: What if
mailed-by: gmail.com

Good afternoon, Mr. Le.

Quick question. For tha sake of argument, who's to say these guys didn't plan and plot to victimize somebody in that parking lot considering his interactions with the subjects before I arrived?

I feel like these charges are racially motivated because after all, this was two Armenian Men in Glendale against a Black man so that's why everything has been unfair. Even if they want to try me, they'd have to press charges on tha other two since it can be argued that all of us put the public in danger. Otherwise, this is surely a violation of my rights and an equal protection issue.

It's not right to file charges against me just because I'm who they'd rather believe is guilty. This is not right nor is it in tha interest of justice. There's too high a risk they are penalizing tha true victim in this case. Using speculation as a means to overlook tha malicious intent of two Armenian Men in Glendale against a peaceful citizen sounds like racial discrimination to me. That's tha only reason why this whole case is "fucked up". These charges are unethical.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 4, 2022, 8:55 AM
subject: RE: What if
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

Lets touch bases before noon today. I will give you a call when I am done w/ court.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 4, 2022, 9:50 AM
subject: Re: What if
mailed-by: gmail.com

Ok. Take your time. Call me at your earliest convenience. I'll be available.

Thanks

🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 2, 2023, 12:33 PM
subject: Re:
mailed-by: gmail.com

Good afternoon, Mr. Le.

Can you tell me what happened in court yesterday when the judge called you and tha prosecutor to her chambers?

What's going on with this case?

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 2, 2023, 1:49 PM
subject: RE: Re:
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

She wanted to give the DA a background of the case outside the presence of Michael’s parents. Basically said that the parents come every time, and has gotten into it with you at times so that’s why they are seated in court. She put the blame more so on them for getting into it with you. She also let the DA know that Michael Y. seemed like he had problems that day, and initiated what happened. She is encouraging us to resolve it. I asked the DA to review the file from our perspective, and dismiss the attempted murder outright.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 2, 2023, 2:28 PM
subject: Re: Re:
mailed-by: gmail.com

And what are we doing about the hit & run charges?

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 2, 2023, 2:41 PM
subject: Re: Re:
mailed-by: gmail.com

If we want to be technical, Michael Y.'s father had the first opportunity to render aid and/or contact emergency but instead took matters into his own hands and compelled me to flee. How are we dealing with that?

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 3, 2023, 9:37 AM
subject: RE: Re:
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

You have pled Not Guilty to those charges. We will be going to trial on those charges. I am trying to get them to dismiss the most serious charges b/c they were willing to do that if you were going to take a deal where you had to plead no contest. I asked the new DA to dismiss the attempted murder b/c it was an accident.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 3, 2023, 9:39 AM
subject: RE: Re:
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

I gave you a copy of the CALCRIM instruction for the hit and run charge and attempted murder charge. I also went over it with you. That’s how we are dealing with it. By negating one of the elements. Have a good weekend Michael.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 3, 2023, 9:49 AM
subject: Re: Re:
mailed-by: gmail.com

I'll have to represent myself at trial. That's a promise.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 3, 2023, 9:57 AM
subject: RE: Re:
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)

That is your constitutional right to do so Michael.

⬇️⬇️⬇️

from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Mar 3, 2023, 10:26 AM
subject: Re: Re:
mailed-by: gmail.com

This tha bullshit I'm talking about.

You gon tell me it's my constitutional right to represent myself yet you don't even acknowledge my constitutional right to EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.

You're fucking fired, my friend.

The Daroca-Bell Dossier

Comments

Full Archive

Show more