The Daroca-Bell Dossier: Exhibit #11 "Daroca-Bell Pathologizes Client's Religious Beliefs In Privilege Breach, Repurposes Diversion Evaluation Into Competency Assessment In Violation Of Court Order" (January 9th, 2024 thru February 14th, 2024)
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 9, 2024, 4:18 AM
subject: RE: What's The Deal?
mailed-by: gmail.com
Good morning, Kristoffer and Danielle. Hope you are feeling better.
Are we game planning before court on January 24th or am I gonna be steamrolled once again? I spoke to the mental health diversion doctor a couple of days ago. He's supposed to call me back some time soon to complete his assessment.
I still intend to file a police report against the alleged victim for his deliberate threats against my life. It's a fucking shame I'm not safe in my own community smh.
If I have rights to be secured and protected from fear, intimidation, and physical harm caused by the activities of violent individuals and groups then there should be a challenge to the application of charges against me. Equal protection aside, the state Legislature gives me these rights as they do for all people.
We're all Americans here. I will not be discriminated to my face while you smart stupid people act like you don't see what's going on. Like I have to explain the obvious to you. Please don't put me thru that again. Take accountability for how intelligent you truly are and spare me the bureaucratic charades. My life is on the line here and I've been the most zealous defender in my case thus far.
You will not get by thinking all you gotta do is stand in for me. I seek every bit of the zealous defense due me and I'm not tolerating any gaslighting. If you gaslight me one more time I will openly address you whenever and wherever it happens.
I know what I'm talking about because I'm the one sending you the email after the holidays. You public defenders are well in over your own heads here. You were just gonna let the court day come with predetermined decisions.
And we will need to address Ms. Bell remaining my lawyer because after she stormed out of our last meeting AND the inference that she will still be my lawyer going forward makes me feel like you guys are determined to screw me over. She will be my lawyer if I say so. But you will not make these decisions for me if my lawyer is throwing tantrums during off the record meetings it's completely unacceptable. Prepare to explain to Judge Clover how you've guys been refusing to preserve my rights on the record against my wishes since arraignment.
And to give you some transparency, I am highly skeptical of the fact that mostly all of you in the public defenders office are religious Catholics. Catholics are bold and blasphemous people who give themselves authority to alter the oracles of God. Catholics changed the sabbath day and politicizes religion beyond its normal context. In basic terms, being catholic or merely having a catholic past tells me you can wash people up and not lose sleep over it. Catholics think they are saved by their rituals which is why you guys think all you have to do is steamroll me and nobody really cares. You tell me the bare minimum and instead of making sure I understand, you only care that you covered your basis. Catholicism is a wrong religion. It's based on lies deceit and falsehoods just like the charges against me who come from other Catholics in the prosecutor's office. Yall all just a bunch of Roman Catholics who do the devil's bidding.
If I wake up everyday fighting to make a difference when it counts in the lives of others, what level of zeal do you think I intend to provide for myself?
I still intend to pursue diversion. But, potential discrimination in the application of law against me needs to be addressed in the court and on the record! No one gets away with professional misconduct. And what else am I to think if my own lawyer storms out of our meeting because I reject the prosecutor's so-called leverage? She stormed out of that office like a prosecutor who knew they lost but couldn't accept it.
We have too much to talk about for me to be the one contacting you yet you telling me I only have 2 options smh. I reject only having two options while I qualify for every form of civil protection one could have against these discriminatory charges.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Glory Shalom <gloryshalom@gmail.com>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
date: Jan 9, 2024, 10:44 AM
subject: Re: What's The Deal?
mailed-by: gmail.com
signed-by: gmail.com
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Lord have mercy
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 10, 2024, 9:18 AM
subject: Re: What's The Deal?
mailed-by: gmail.com
If I don't get a response before week's end, I know I'm right in my perception on this case.
I'd like Mr. McFarren to explain to me, in his own words, why I shouldn't file a police report about the threats the alleged victim has made against my life. I am genuinely concerned about my safety in Los Angeles. Pasadena is my hometown and the Armenian demographics there are high like Glendale.
And please, don't act offended by how disgruntled I am. Indeed, I am disgruntled. Just be thankful. Be thankful that your affairs are in order and you have a descent paying job. Be thankful that you can actually afford to pay your rent and car insurance...on time. Lastly, be thankful that 15 years in prison isn't hanging over your head.
As for me, I will process this situation the best I know how. And I appreciate your bearing with me thru these circumstances.
Thank you for understanding.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 10, 2024, 12:50 PM
subject: RE: What's The Deal?
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
Good afternoon. I am not offended by how disgruntled you are. You have every right to be upset about your predicament. However, I find it inappropriate for you to accuse us of doing the devil’s bidding because (as you believe) we are all Catholics. In the future, I would appreciate you refraining from making such comments.
As to the next steps on your case and to whether it is in your best interest to file a police report, Ms. Bell and I are happy to meet with you at our office once again before your next court date. We are both available next Friday, 1/19 from 2-3pm. Please let us know if this works for your schedule.
Thank you for your patience. We look forward to speaking with you.
Sincerely,
Kris G McFarren
Kristoffer G. McFarren (He/Him/His)
Head Deputy – Pasadena Branch & Area Offices
Los Angeles County Public Defender
300 E. Walnut Street, Suite 311
Pasadena, California 91101
(626) 356-5484
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 10, 2024, 12:52 PM
subject: Re: What's The Deal?
mailed-by: gmail.com
Ok yea perhaps that was a bit much. I apologize. Jan.19 2-3p works for me.
Thanks
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Priceline <info@travel.priceline.com>
reply-to: info@travel.priceline.com
to: michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com
date: Jan 17, 2024, 1:54 PM
subject: Your trip on January 20, 2024
mailed-by: em4982.travel.priceline.com
signed-by: travel.priceline.com
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Congrats, your flight on Saturday, January 20, 2024 is confirmed!
Priceline Trip Number: 468-148-455-17
To view your full itinerary, click here.
Seattle, WA Los Angeles, CA
Saturday, January 20, 2024
1 Ticket(s)
Airline Confirmation Number(s)
American Airlines: CTJCZY
Passengers : Michael Bernard Taylor
Ticket Number: 0017006797890
Sat Jan 20 Seattle, WA Los Angeles, CA ( 2h 54m )
SEA LAX
Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport to Los Angeles Intl Airport
06:00 AM - 08:54 AM
Operated by American Airlines
American Airlines Flight 4866
Non stop
Economy Class - Embraer 175
Important Information
Airline change penalties and restrictions apply. Most tickets are non-refundable.
Airline Tickets are non-transferrable. Name changes or adjustments are not allowed
You will be issued electronic tickets. Remember to bring a valid government-issued photo ID with you to check-in.
Federal law forbids the carriage of hazardous materials such as aerosols, fireworks, and flammable liquids aboard aircraft in your luggage or on your person. For full details on prohibited materials contact your airline or visit the FAA website.
Payment Summary
Priceline trip number
468-148-455-17
Purchase date
Jan 17, 2024
Payment method
Mastercard (6075)
Billing name
Glory Roberts
Ticket cost
$105.12
Taxes and fees
$22.98
Number of travelers
1
Flight subtotal
$128.10
Seat cost
$14.43
Total charged
$142.53
This itinerary including summary of charges is your official receipt.
Prices are in USD.
See American Airlines baggage information for additional fees that may apply.
Your booking includes a non-refundable seat reservation fee of $14.43.
Seattle to Los Angeles – AA 4866
Jan 20, 2024, 6:00 AM–8:54 AM
Take-off
Jan 20, 2024, 6:00 AM
Landing
Jan 20, 2024, 8:54 AM
Flight duration
2 hr, 54 min
Passenger name
Michael Bernard Taylor
Seat
-
Confirmation number
468-148-455-17
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
cc: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 19, 2024, 1:04 PM
subject: Let's Try This Again
mailed-by: gmail.com
Good afternoon, team.
I'm terribly sorry that I am this upset and disgruntled about my circumstances. I am sorry for making this too challenging and being so disrespectful towards you guys. Perhaps the bigger picture here is a character building process for me. I have not been proud of my performances on behalf of the public defenders office and deep down in my heart I know you guys don't deserve this treatment from me.
But, I will fight to adopt a better attitude about these circumstances, as bad as they are. May your resilience with me be an inspiration for my own personal growth.
I'm still upset. But, I promise I will be on my best behavior for this court date and will follow your lead. Again, thank you for bearing with me thru this. Quiet as kept, I'm blessed to even have you fighting for me.
Thank you.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
cc: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 19, 2024, 2:26 PM
subject: Re: Let's Try This Again
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Thank you for your kind words, Mr Taylor! We hope you can continue to enjoy your birthday weekend. We are here to help and see you next week. Please let me know if you need a chat between now and court. If not, I plan to meet with you at court before your hearing begins! See you soon and safe travels!
Thank you,
Samantha Arensdorff- Ruiz, LCSW
Psychiatric Social Worker
HOPE - East Region
Law Offices of the Los Angeles County Public Defender
300 S. Park Ave
Suite 900
Pomona CA 91767
Office Phone: 909.868.6424
Cell Phone: 424.403.0027
Email: SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov
“Fight for the things that you care about, but do it in a way that will lead others to join you.” - RBG
*** EMAIL IS THE BEST WAY TO REACH ME ***
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
cc: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 19, 2024, 3:12 PM
subject: RE: Let's Try This Again
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Thank you, Mr. Taylor. I wish you a safe and happy weekend. Please take care of yourself. We will see you next week.
to: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 9, 2024, 4:18 AM
subject: RE: What's The Deal?
mailed-by: gmail.com
Good morning, Kristoffer and Danielle. Hope you are feeling better.
Are we game planning before court on January 24th or am I gonna be steamrolled once again? I spoke to the mental health diversion doctor a couple of days ago. He's supposed to call me back some time soon to complete his assessment.
I still intend to file a police report against the alleged victim for his deliberate threats against my life. It's a fucking shame I'm not safe in my own community smh.
If I have rights to be secured and protected from fear, intimidation, and physical harm caused by the activities of violent individuals and groups then there should be a challenge to the application of charges against me. Equal protection aside, the state Legislature gives me these rights as they do for all people.
We're all Americans here. I will not be discriminated to my face while you smart stupid people act like you don't see what's going on. Like I have to explain the obvious to you. Please don't put me thru that again. Take accountability for how intelligent you truly are and spare me the bureaucratic charades. My life is on the line here and I've been the most zealous defender in my case thus far.
You will not get by thinking all you gotta do is stand in for me. I seek every bit of the zealous defense due me and I'm not tolerating any gaslighting. If you gaslight me one more time I will openly address you whenever and wherever it happens.
I know what I'm talking about because I'm the one sending you the email after the holidays. You public defenders are well in over your own heads here. You were just gonna let the court day come with predetermined decisions.
And we will need to address Ms. Bell remaining my lawyer because after she stormed out of our last meeting AND the inference that she will still be my lawyer going forward makes me feel like you guys are determined to screw me over. She will be my lawyer if I say so. But you will not make these decisions for me if my lawyer is throwing tantrums during off the record meetings it's completely unacceptable. Prepare to explain to Judge Clover how you've guys been refusing to preserve my rights on the record against my wishes since arraignment.
And to give you some transparency, I am highly skeptical of the fact that mostly all of you in the public defenders office are religious Catholics. Catholics are bold and blasphemous people who give themselves authority to alter the oracles of God. Catholics changed the sabbath day and politicizes religion beyond its normal context. In basic terms, being catholic or merely having a catholic past tells me you can wash people up and not lose sleep over it. Catholics think they are saved by their rituals which is why you guys think all you have to do is steamroll me and nobody really cares. You tell me the bare minimum and instead of making sure I understand, you only care that you covered your basis. Catholicism is a wrong religion. It's based on lies deceit and falsehoods just like the charges against me who come from other Catholics in the prosecutor's office. Yall all just a bunch of Roman Catholics who do the devil's bidding.
If I wake up everyday fighting to make a difference when it counts in the lives of others, what level of zeal do you think I intend to provide for myself?
I still intend to pursue diversion. But, potential discrimination in the application of law against me needs to be addressed in the court and on the record! No one gets away with professional misconduct. And what else am I to think if my own lawyer storms out of our meeting because I reject the prosecutor's so-called leverage? She stormed out of that office like a prosecutor who knew they lost but couldn't accept it.
We have too much to talk about for me to be the one contacting you yet you telling me I only have 2 options smh. I reject only having two options while I qualify for every form of civil protection one could have against these discriminatory charges.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Glory Shalom <gloryshalom@gmail.com>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
date: Jan 9, 2024, 10:44 AM
subject: Re: What's The Deal?
mailed-by: gmail.com
signed-by: gmail.com
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Lord have mercy
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 10, 2024, 9:18 AM
subject: Re: What's The Deal?
mailed-by: gmail.com
If I don't get a response before week's end, I know I'm right in my perception on this case.
I'd like Mr. McFarren to explain to me, in his own words, why I shouldn't file a police report about the threats the alleged victim has made against my life. I am genuinely concerned about my safety in Los Angeles. Pasadena is my hometown and the Armenian demographics there are high like Glendale.
And please, don't act offended by how disgruntled I am. Indeed, I am disgruntled. Just be thankful. Be thankful that your affairs are in order and you have a descent paying job. Be thankful that you can actually afford to pay your rent and car insurance...on time. Lastly, be thankful that 15 years in prison isn't hanging over your head.
As for me, I will process this situation the best I know how. And I appreciate your bearing with me thru these circumstances.
Thank you for understanding.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 10, 2024, 12:50 PM
subject: RE: What's The Deal?
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
Good afternoon. I am not offended by how disgruntled you are. You have every right to be upset about your predicament. However, I find it inappropriate for you to accuse us of doing the devil’s bidding because (as you believe) we are all Catholics. In the future, I would appreciate you refraining from making such comments.
As to the next steps on your case and to whether it is in your best interest to file a police report, Ms. Bell and I are happy to meet with you at our office once again before your next court date. We are both available next Friday, 1/19 from 2-3pm. Please let us know if this works for your schedule.
Thank you for your patience. We look forward to speaking with you.
Sincerely,
Kris G McFarren
Kristoffer G. McFarren (He/Him/His)
Head Deputy – Pasadena Branch & Area Offices
Los Angeles County Public Defender
300 E. Walnut Street, Suite 311
Pasadena, California 91101
(626) 356-5484
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 10, 2024, 12:52 PM
subject: Re: What's The Deal?
mailed-by: gmail.com
Ok yea perhaps that was a bit much. I apologize. Jan.19 2-3p works for me.
Thanks
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Priceline <info@travel.priceline.com>
reply-to: info@travel.priceline.com
to: michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com
date: Jan 17, 2024, 1:54 PM
subject: Your trip on January 20, 2024
mailed-by: em4982.travel.priceline.com
signed-by: travel.priceline.com
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Congrats, your flight on Saturday, January 20, 2024 is confirmed!
Priceline Trip Number: 468-148-455-17
To view your full itinerary, click here.
Seattle, WA Los Angeles, CA
Saturday, January 20, 2024
1 Ticket(s)
Airline Confirmation Number(s)
American Airlines: CTJCZY
Passengers : Michael Bernard Taylor
Ticket Number: 0017006797890
Sat Jan 20 Seattle, WA Los Angeles, CA ( 2h 54m )
SEA LAX
Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport to Los Angeles Intl Airport
06:00 AM - 08:54 AM
Operated by American Airlines
American Airlines Flight 4866
Non stop
Economy Class - Embraer 175
Important Information
Airline change penalties and restrictions apply. Most tickets are non-refundable.
Airline Tickets are non-transferrable. Name changes or adjustments are not allowed
You will be issued electronic tickets. Remember to bring a valid government-issued photo ID with you to check-in.
Federal law forbids the carriage of hazardous materials such as aerosols, fireworks, and flammable liquids aboard aircraft in your luggage or on your person. For full details on prohibited materials contact your airline or visit the FAA website.
Payment Summary
Priceline trip number
468-148-455-17
Purchase date
Jan 17, 2024
Payment method
Mastercard (6075)
Billing name
Glory Roberts
Ticket cost
$105.12
Taxes and fees
$22.98
Number of travelers
1
Flight subtotal
$128.10
Seat cost
$14.43
Total charged
$142.53
This itinerary including summary of charges is your official receipt.
Prices are in USD.
See American Airlines baggage information for additional fees that may apply.
Your booking includes a non-refundable seat reservation fee of $14.43.
Seattle to Los Angeles – AA 4866
Jan 20, 2024, 6:00 AM–8:54 AM
Take-off
Jan 20, 2024, 6:00 AM
Landing
Jan 20, 2024, 8:54 AM
Flight duration
2 hr, 54 min
Passenger name
Michael Bernard Taylor
Seat
-
Confirmation number
468-148-455-17
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
cc: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 19, 2024, 1:04 PM
subject: Let's Try This Again
mailed-by: gmail.com
Good afternoon, team.
I'm terribly sorry that I am this upset and disgruntled about my circumstances. I am sorry for making this too challenging and being so disrespectful towards you guys. Perhaps the bigger picture here is a character building process for me. I have not been proud of my performances on behalf of the public defenders office and deep down in my heart I know you guys don't deserve this treatment from me.
But, I will fight to adopt a better attitude about these circumstances, as bad as they are. May your resilience with me be an inspiration for my own personal growth.
I'm still upset. But, I promise I will be on my best behavior for this court date and will follow your lead. Again, thank you for bearing with me thru this. Quiet as kept, I'm blessed to even have you fighting for me.
Thank you.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
cc: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 19, 2024, 2:26 PM
subject: Re: Let's Try This Again
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Thank you for your kind words, Mr Taylor! We hope you can continue to enjoy your birthday weekend. We are here to help and see you next week. Please let me know if you need a chat between now and court. If not, I plan to meet with you at court before your hearing begins! See you soon and safe travels!
Thank you,
Samantha Arensdorff- Ruiz, LCSW
Psychiatric Social Worker
HOPE - East Region
Law Offices of the Los Angeles County Public Defender
300 S. Park Ave
Suite 900
Pomona CA 91767
Office Phone: 909.868.6424
Cell Phone: 424.403.0027
Email: SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov
“Fight for the things that you care about, but do it in a way that will lead others to join you.” - RBG
*** EMAIL IS THE BEST WAY TO REACH ME ***
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
cc: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Jan 19, 2024, 3:12 PM
subject: RE: Let's Try This Again
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Thank you, Mr. Taylor. I wish you a safe and happy weekend. Please take care of yourself. We will see you next week.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
⬇️⬇️⬇️
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Criminal Division
Pasadena Dept. F
XNEGA111132-01
January 24, 2024
8:30AM
The People of the State of California
vs.
TAYLOR, MICHAEL BERNARD J
Honorable Suzette Clover, Judge
J. Diaz, Judicial Assistant Verlaine Turner (#6201), Court Reporter
PC664-187(a), VC20001(b)(2), VC20002(a)
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Pretrial Conference/Trial Setting
The following parties are present for the aforementioned proceeding:
MICHAEL BERNARD J TAYLOR, Defendant
Danielle Marie Bell, Deputy Public Defender
Frances Young standing in for the prosecutor.
The matter is called for Pretrial Conference/Trial Setting.
Defense counsel states they do not have an expert report and requests additional time.
Defense counsel indicates the defendant has been receiving threats through social media.
The court strongly admonishes the victim's family not to contact or make threats towards the defendant. The court admonishes the defendant to not contact the victim or the victim's family.
Pursuant to stipulation, Pretrial Conference/Trial Setting day of days: 00 of 60 is continued to Wednesday, February 14, 2024, at 8:30 AM in Pasadena Dept. F.
The Defendant waives time for trial.
The Defendant is ordered to return on the above date.
Defendant Bond Posted.
Cash Bail : LAB672360002, Cash Bail to Stand
Minute Order Page 1 of 1
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 1, 2024, 1:34 PM
subject: RE: Implied Guilt
mailed-by: gmail.com
There is still so much we should be discussing about my case. We should not be letting whole weeks just roll on by.
The charges against me are simply just outright unlawful and unconstitutional and MUST BE challenged before a trial date might be set. I will not be robbed of my due diligence, please and thank you.
What I am, and have been requesting for years now, is my rights to be preserved on the record, to raise discriminatory concerns in the application of law against me, and to provide a zealous defense on my behalf. What I am requesting is absolutely consistent with the principles of justice and the interests of the court. Because even a denied motion doesn't hurt us for covering our basis. So, quite frankly, I don't see any reason why these concerns of mine cannot nor should not be raised in the court and on the record.
The gaslighter never admits to gaslighting any more than pilgrim settlers referred to themselves as colonizers.
Any further insistence on prohibiting these interests of mine will be perceived as a conflict of interest and will need to be addressed to the judge to bolster my claims for equal protection and due process violations. Indeed, I have more reason to believe the public defenders office has contributed to my disparate treatment than otherwise.
Imagine getting picked up by a pro basketball team and refusing to play defense just because you rather play offense only. Don't confuse motion for progress. I'd like to be treated and respected as a thinking agent. All lies, all red flags, all potential misunderstandings MUST be addressed before moving forward.
Due process is not satisfied just by giving defendants a mere trial. But, that trial MUST be fair and evenly applied. My only liability is a traffic infraction, which is what makes these charges discriminatory if I am being charged exclusively.
And as unfortunate and inconvenient as this has been in my life, I'd still be inherently upset if a prosecutor let a criminal go in a case I had nothing to do with. Crimes should be prosecuted, victims should not. This case will not be resolved until these issues are addressed to this prejudice court system. I have no more tolerance for grey areas and charades. I want understanding to be understood by all please.
Public defenders are legal professionals who are ethically bound to vigorously defend their clients' interests. While they may challenge prosecutors' arguments directly, their approach is guided by legal standards, professional ethics, and the best interests of their clients. Public defenders are not inherently afraid to challenge prosecutors; rather, they operate within the bounds of the law to provide a zealous defense for their clients. They often challenge evidence, question legal interpretations, and raise constitutional issues to ensure a fair trial.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 6, 2024, 12:01 PM
subject: RE: Defense Measures
mailed-by: gmail.com
If we can spend money on doctors, we can spend money on acquiring relevant demographic data on the area in which the incident took place. Below is a link to all demographic data pertaining to zip code 91204.
https://zipatlas.com/us/CA/zip-code-91204.htm
We specifically need demographic data relevant to the Asian and/or Armenian population disparity in contrast to Black, African, or other races in 91204. These data sets will support our argument for how racial bias directly influenced the discriminatory charging decisions against the defendant.
Also, we will not be using any form of the racial justice act. Rather, we will cite the following case law:
Yick Wo vs. Hopkins
Yes, the principles established in the Yick Wo v. Hopkins case can indeed be applied to how defendants are charged. The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment ensures that laws must be applied equally to all individuals, regardless of race, nationality, or other characteristics. This means that law enforcement and prosecutors cannot selectively enforce laws or bring charges against individuals based on discriminatory criteria. Any differential treatment in charging defendants based on such factors would likely be unconstitutional and a violation of their equal protection rights.
The Yick Wo v. Hopkins case was a landmark decision in 1886 where the Supreme Court ruled that the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause applied to state and local governments. The case involved discriminatory enforcement of a laundry law in San Francisco against Chinese immigrants. The court held that the law was applied unfairly, violating the constitutional rights of the laundry owners, and established the principle that laws must be applied equally to all individuals regardless of race or nationality.
The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to state action, meaning it governs how government entities treat individuals. In the context of criminal prosecution, equal protection requires that the government, including law enforcement and prosecutors, cannot selectively enforce laws or bring charges against individuals based on discriminatory criteria, such as race.
If a defendant is being charged for a crime, and it's evident that their attackers, who may be of another race, are not being charged despite committing similar offenses, it could potentially raise concerns about unequal treatment under the law. While the government has prosecutorial discretion and may choose not to pursue charges in certain cases due to various factors such as insufficient evidence, unequal treatment based on race or other protected characteristics could constitute a violation of the defendant's equal protection rights.
Yes, Yick Wo v. Hopkins can still be a valid case law example to cite in a criminal case by a defendant arguing equal protection, even if the defendant's circumstances differ from those in the original case. The principles established in Yick Wo v. Hopkins are not limited to the specific facts of the laundry business; rather, they stand as a precedent for the broader principle that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to protect individuals from discriminatory treatment by the government.
Therefore, if a defendant believes that they are being unfairly targeted or treated differently in their criminal case based on their race, nationality, or another protected characteristic, they can cite Yick Wo v. Hopkins to argue that such differential treatment violates their constitutional rights to equal protection under the law.
While the specifics of the defendant's case may differ from those in Yick Wo v. Hopkins, the underlying principle of equal protection remains applicable, and the case can still be cited as persuasive authority to support the defendant's argument.
It is not ethical for a public defender to refuse to argue equal protection for their client solely to prevent a strained relationship with the prosecutor. Public defenders have a duty to vigorously advocate for their clients' legal interests and to provide effective representation, regardless of any potential conflicts or tensions with other parties involved in the legal process.
Ethical guidelines for attorneys, including public defenders, emphasize the importance of zealous advocacy, loyalty to the client, and upholding the principles of justice and fairness. Refusing to argue a valid legal claim, such as an equal protection violation, because of concerns about damaging relationships with prosecutors would be a breach of these ethical duties.
Public defenders are expected to prioritize their clients' interests above their own personal concerns or professional relationships.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 7, 2024, 2:21 PM
subject: RE: Concerns
mailed-by: gmail.com
Ignoring my concerns is not an effective way to deal with me. I expect to have a meeting about my concerns before February 14th court date please and thank you. I just don't see how we can't use this to bolster my defense.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
cc: Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 7, 2024, 3:32 PM
subject: RE: Concerns
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Hi Mr. Taylor,
Thank you again for your flexibility in meeting with Dr. Kingston. I know the appointment date and time was changed many times and I appreciate you working with her schedule. I am available to meet with you via phone, but I do not have availability to meet in person prior to 2/14/24. What day is best for you? 2/13/24 looks good for me.
Thank you,
Danielle
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 7, 2024, 4:34 PM
subject: Re: Concerns
mailed-by: gmail.com
Ok, that's not going to work for me, unfortunately as you have known I've had these concerns for some time now. It is important to me that I cover my basis and be well prepared for these court dates. I think Mr. McFarren's presence in the meeting would be necessary as well. To say you can meet over the phone and not in person sends a mixed signal of interest in this matter. Please do not undermine my ability to participate in my own defense and help me help myself by ensuring I understand the ramifications for what I am proposing we do. I do not like to settle for misunderstandings so can we please make the necessary arrangements to get on the same page here?
Thank you
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 7, 2024, 5:19 PM
subject: Re: Concerns
mailed-by: gmail.com
A part of me feels like you may have already detached yourself from doing what's in my best interest, Ms. Bell. I will not settle for a mannequin lawyer and I'm not trying to be insulting when I say that.
It's not that I'm wrong, it's just that you already know you're not going to fight for me to the degree you're supposed to. There's nothing zealous about having only 2 defense options with all these "circumstances" for months on end. The law is much more vast than that and I shouldn't be prejudiced a zealous defense.
Who told officers of the court that they had a right to bend and break the law?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 8, 2024, 10:52 AM
subject: Re: Concerns
mailed-by: gmail.com
Again, ignoring me is not a sufficient way of handling cases. If I don't get a response today I'm coming to your office. I'm not waiting over tha weekend or until tha day of to get shit together. My patience with you guys has worn thin.
I don't know why you guys are challenging me on this matter. What I am asking is for fairness under the law and you are constantly inhibiting my ability to obtain it.
I really don't appreciate your office undermining my goodwill in order to betray my trust. How could you be so arrogant to assume I'm either stupid or not paying close attention?
I want a response to my data request please and how we're going to frame tha argument for the obvious uneven application of law.
If you say you agree with me then stop holding me up! My rights will be preserved on tha record at tha next court date or else I'm going to be extremely upset.
Do me a favor and do your job please. Again, I don't need a mannequin lawyer. I need a defense attorney.
Stop playing with me I am not playing games.
Mr. McFarren you have had every opportunity to respond to me but you're leaving it in tha hands of a lawyer who has already detached herself from my plight here. I will not tolerate insolence.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 8, 2024, 3:08 PM
subject: RE: Failed Contact #3
mailed-by: gmail.com
You guys keep doing everything to avoid me and I don't think you're that busy. You're just trying to help the prosecutor succeed in prejudice towards me.
There's no excuse for failing to defend my rights as requested time and time again amidst an obvious uneven application of law. I am going to file my complaint with the Commission on Judicial Performance because this disparate treatment is absolutely uncalled for.
Just because I'm upset does not negate my rights any more than tha severity of injury negates the alleged victim's criminal liability. Crime is crime and prosecutors have a duty and obligation to uphold these principles.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
cc: Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 8, 2024, 3:19 PM
subject: RE: Failed Contact #3
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I have offered you whatever availability I have in my calendar. I am available for a phone meeting on Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 11:15 AM. I have another meeting starting at 12. Are you available to meet via phone at that time?
Thank you,
Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 8, 2024, 3:24 PM
subject: Re: Failed Contact #3
mailed-by: gmail.com
You're asking a question I already answered. This is basically your way of denying me due process without saying it.
Meeting or not you need to be prepared to preserve my rights on tha record 2/14 no exceptions so we can proceed smoothly with this case together or cause further dissension in my life by gaslighting me to my face. The least you can do is do it to build my confidence back in your office.
It's not one or tha other. It's both. Diversion AND tha challenge to tha application of law. For better or worse.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 9, 2024, 7:19 AM
subject: RE: Your Legal Reminders
mailed-by: gmail.com
We want the complete demographic report for zip code 91204 offered by zipatlas. I'd appreciate a response on this request please.
If a public defender fails to adequately defend their client's constitutional rights during pretrial, it could be considered a denial of due process. Defendants have the right to effective assistance of counsel, and if this right is not upheld, it may result in an unfair outcome and violate the principles of due process guaranteed by the Constitution.
A defendant still has the right to assert their rights on the record during pretrial proceedings, even if their lawyer disagrees. Ultimately, it is the defendant's decision whether to assert their rights, and their lawyer's role is to provide guidance and advice. However, if there is a disagreement between the defendant and their lawyer, the defendant may choose to proceed in asserting their rights despite their lawyer's opinion.
The principle of equal protection applies to all individuals, including defendants, regardless of whether they have been accused of committing a crime or not. Equal protection under the law ensures that all individuals are treated fairly and equally by the legal system, regardless of their circumstances or background. This principle is a fundamental aspect of the U.S. Constitution and is intended to prevent discrimination and ensure justice for all.
The principle of equal protection under the law requires that individuals be treated fairly and without discrimination by the legal system, regardless of their race or the severity of their injuries. If a defendant is being charged based solely on speculation while alleged victims of another race remain uncharged for similar conduct, it could raise concerns about unequal treatment and potential discrimination. The severity of injuries suffered by the parties involved does not negate the defendant's right to equal protection under the law. All individuals should be afforded the same legal protections and due process regardless of their circumstances.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Noah Cox <NCox@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 13, 2024, 11:06 AM
subject: RE: Case Law examples
mailed-by: gmail.com
Good morning.
For whatever it's worth, I have researched and found almost 30 case law examples particularly in California Supreme Court that directly challenges the charges against me. There are far more of these that reaffirm and emphasize duties of prosecutors regarding charging decisions. These are what I was able to gather over tha weekend leading up to our meeting here in a bit.
I understand you guys are more inclined to do a deal with tha devil, but I will not be refused due process or effective counsel.
Cases are as follows:
People vs Woods 1992
People vs. Antick 1975
People vs Prettyman 1996
People vs McCoy 2001
People vs Yarber 2017
People vs Montoya 1994
People vs Caldwell 1984
People vs Willard 2018
People vs Reyes 1997
People vs Paredes 2009
People vs Kauffman 1907
People vs Durham 1969
People vs Escobar 1992
People vs Luparello 1986
People vs Beeman 1984
People vs Favor 2012
People vs Zendejas 1987
People vs Turner 2017
People vs Eubanks 1996
People vs Watson 1981
People vs Smallwood 2016
People vs Smith 2003
People vs Sengpadychith 2001
People vs Johnson 2008
People vs Nelson 2010
People vs Hammond 2008
People vs Richardson 2015
I'd like these cases to be explored as soon as possible.
Please remember, officers of the court have an obligation and duty to UPHOLD rights of defendants, not to undermine them. Your usual way of conducting business is unsatisfactory if it goes against lawful principles. Public defenders have the same responsibilities as private attorneys in regard to effective counsel and zealous representation.
How could all this case law exist and you guys utterly fail to explore or investigate all legal avenues if I'm not being prejudiced by my own defense?
I want answers to my questions please. No exemptions. I have a right to know and understand the nature of charges against me.
Thank you.
Criminal Division
Pasadena Dept. F
XNEGA111132-01
January 24, 2024
8:30AM
The People of the State of California
vs.
TAYLOR, MICHAEL BERNARD J
Honorable Suzette Clover, Judge
J. Diaz, Judicial Assistant Verlaine Turner (#6201), Court Reporter
PC664-187(a), VC20001(b)(2), VC20002(a)
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Pretrial Conference/Trial Setting
The following parties are present for the aforementioned proceeding:
MICHAEL BERNARD J TAYLOR, Defendant
Danielle Marie Bell, Deputy Public Defender
Frances Young standing in for the prosecutor.
The matter is called for Pretrial Conference/Trial Setting.
Defense counsel states they do not have an expert report and requests additional time.
Defense counsel indicates the defendant has been receiving threats through social media.
The court strongly admonishes the victim's family not to contact or make threats towards the defendant. The court admonishes the defendant to not contact the victim or the victim's family.
Pursuant to stipulation, Pretrial Conference/Trial Setting day of days: 00 of 60 is continued to Wednesday, February 14, 2024, at 8:30 AM in Pasadena Dept. F.
The Defendant waives time for trial.
The Defendant is ordered to return on the above date.
Defendant Bond Posted.
Cash Bail : LAB672360002, Cash Bail to Stand
Minute Order Page 1 of 1
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 1, 2024, 1:34 PM
subject: RE: Implied Guilt
mailed-by: gmail.com
There is still so much we should be discussing about my case. We should not be letting whole weeks just roll on by.
The charges against me are simply just outright unlawful and unconstitutional and MUST BE challenged before a trial date might be set. I will not be robbed of my due diligence, please and thank you.
What I am, and have been requesting for years now, is my rights to be preserved on the record, to raise discriminatory concerns in the application of law against me, and to provide a zealous defense on my behalf. What I am requesting is absolutely consistent with the principles of justice and the interests of the court. Because even a denied motion doesn't hurt us for covering our basis. So, quite frankly, I don't see any reason why these concerns of mine cannot nor should not be raised in the court and on the record.
The gaslighter never admits to gaslighting any more than pilgrim settlers referred to themselves as colonizers.
Any further insistence on prohibiting these interests of mine will be perceived as a conflict of interest and will need to be addressed to the judge to bolster my claims for equal protection and due process violations. Indeed, I have more reason to believe the public defenders office has contributed to my disparate treatment than otherwise.
Imagine getting picked up by a pro basketball team and refusing to play defense just because you rather play offense only. Don't confuse motion for progress. I'd like to be treated and respected as a thinking agent. All lies, all red flags, all potential misunderstandings MUST be addressed before moving forward.
Due process is not satisfied just by giving defendants a mere trial. But, that trial MUST be fair and evenly applied. My only liability is a traffic infraction, which is what makes these charges discriminatory if I am being charged exclusively.
And as unfortunate and inconvenient as this has been in my life, I'd still be inherently upset if a prosecutor let a criminal go in a case I had nothing to do with. Crimes should be prosecuted, victims should not. This case will not be resolved until these issues are addressed to this prejudice court system. I have no more tolerance for grey areas and charades. I want understanding to be understood by all please.
Public defenders are legal professionals who are ethically bound to vigorously defend their clients' interests. While they may challenge prosecutors' arguments directly, their approach is guided by legal standards, professional ethics, and the best interests of their clients. Public defenders are not inherently afraid to challenge prosecutors; rather, they operate within the bounds of the law to provide a zealous defense for their clients. They often challenge evidence, question legal interpretations, and raise constitutional issues to ensure a fair trial.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 6, 2024, 12:01 PM
subject: RE: Defense Measures
mailed-by: gmail.com
If we can spend money on doctors, we can spend money on acquiring relevant demographic data on the area in which the incident took place. Below is a link to all demographic data pertaining to zip code 91204.
https://zipatlas.com/us/CA/zip-code-91204.htm
We specifically need demographic data relevant to the Asian and/or Armenian population disparity in contrast to Black, African, or other races in 91204. These data sets will support our argument for how racial bias directly influenced the discriminatory charging decisions against the defendant.
Also, we will not be using any form of the racial justice act. Rather, we will cite the following case law:
Yick Wo vs. Hopkins
Yes, the principles established in the Yick Wo v. Hopkins case can indeed be applied to how defendants are charged. The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment ensures that laws must be applied equally to all individuals, regardless of race, nationality, or other characteristics. This means that law enforcement and prosecutors cannot selectively enforce laws or bring charges against individuals based on discriminatory criteria. Any differential treatment in charging defendants based on such factors would likely be unconstitutional and a violation of their equal protection rights.
The Yick Wo v. Hopkins case was a landmark decision in 1886 where the Supreme Court ruled that the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause applied to state and local governments. The case involved discriminatory enforcement of a laundry law in San Francisco against Chinese immigrants. The court held that the law was applied unfairly, violating the constitutional rights of the laundry owners, and established the principle that laws must be applied equally to all individuals regardless of race or nationality.
The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to state action, meaning it governs how government entities treat individuals. In the context of criminal prosecution, equal protection requires that the government, including law enforcement and prosecutors, cannot selectively enforce laws or bring charges against individuals based on discriminatory criteria, such as race.
If a defendant is being charged for a crime, and it's evident that their attackers, who may be of another race, are not being charged despite committing similar offenses, it could potentially raise concerns about unequal treatment under the law. While the government has prosecutorial discretion and may choose not to pursue charges in certain cases due to various factors such as insufficient evidence, unequal treatment based on race or other protected characteristics could constitute a violation of the defendant's equal protection rights.
Yes, Yick Wo v. Hopkins can still be a valid case law example to cite in a criminal case by a defendant arguing equal protection, even if the defendant's circumstances differ from those in the original case. The principles established in Yick Wo v. Hopkins are not limited to the specific facts of the laundry business; rather, they stand as a precedent for the broader principle that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to protect individuals from discriminatory treatment by the government.
Therefore, if a defendant believes that they are being unfairly targeted or treated differently in their criminal case based on their race, nationality, or another protected characteristic, they can cite Yick Wo v. Hopkins to argue that such differential treatment violates their constitutional rights to equal protection under the law.
While the specifics of the defendant's case may differ from those in Yick Wo v. Hopkins, the underlying principle of equal protection remains applicable, and the case can still be cited as persuasive authority to support the defendant's argument.
It is not ethical for a public defender to refuse to argue equal protection for their client solely to prevent a strained relationship with the prosecutor. Public defenders have a duty to vigorously advocate for their clients' legal interests and to provide effective representation, regardless of any potential conflicts or tensions with other parties involved in the legal process.
Ethical guidelines for attorneys, including public defenders, emphasize the importance of zealous advocacy, loyalty to the client, and upholding the principles of justice and fairness. Refusing to argue a valid legal claim, such as an equal protection violation, because of concerns about damaging relationships with prosecutors would be a breach of these ethical duties.
Public defenders are expected to prioritize their clients' interests above their own personal concerns or professional relationships.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 7, 2024, 2:21 PM
subject: RE: Concerns
mailed-by: gmail.com
Ignoring my concerns is not an effective way to deal with me. I expect to have a meeting about my concerns before February 14th court date please and thank you. I just don't see how we can't use this to bolster my defense.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
cc: Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 7, 2024, 3:32 PM
subject: RE: Concerns
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Hi Mr. Taylor,
Thank you again for your flexibility in meeting with Dr. Kingston. I know the appointment date and time was changed many times and I appreciate you working with her schedule. I am available to meet with you via phone, but I do not have availability to meet in person prior to 2/14/24. What day is best for you? 2/13/24 looks good for me.
Thank you,
Danielle
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 7, 2024, 4:34 PM
subject: Re: Concerns
mailed-by: gmail.com
Ok, that's not going to work for me, unfortunately as you have known I've had these concerns for some time now. It is important to me that I cover my basis and be well prepared for these court dates. I think Mr. McFarren's presence in the meeting would be necessary as well. To say you can meet over the phone and not in person sends a mixed signal of interest in this matter. Please do not undermine my ability to participate in my own defense and help me help myself by ensuring I understand the ramifications for what I am proposing we do. I do not like to settle for misunderstandings so can we please make the necessary arrangements to get on the same page here?
Thank you
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 7, 2024, 5:19 PM
subject: Re: Concerns
mailed-by: gmail.com
A part of me feels like you may have already detached yourself from doing what's in my best interest, Ms. Bell. I will not settle for a mannequin lawyer and I'm not trying to be insulting when I say that.
It's not that I'm wrong, it's just that you already know you're not going to fight for me to the degree you're supposed to. There's nothing zealous about having only 2 defense options with all these "circumstances" for months on end. The law is much more vast than that and I shouldn't be prejudiced a zealous defense.
Who told officers of the court that they had a right to bend and break the law?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 8, 2024, 10:52 AM
subject: Re: Concerns
mailed-by: gmail.com
Again, ignoring me is not a sufficient way of handling cases. If I don't get a response today I'm coming to your office. I'm not waiting over tha weekend or until tha day of to get shit together. My patience with you guys has worn thin.
I don't know why you guys are challenging me on this matter. What I am asking is for fairness under the law and you are constantly inhibiting my ability to obtain it.
I really don't appreciate your office undermining my goodwill in order to betray my trust. How could you be so arrogant to assume I'm either stupid or not paying close attention?
I want a response to my data request please and how we're going to frame tha argument for the obvious uneven application of law.
If you say you agree with me then stop holding me up! My rights will be preserved on tha record at tha next court date or else I'm going to be extremely upset.
Do me a favor and do your job please. Again, I don't need a mannequin lawyer. I need a defense attorney.
Stop playing with me I am not playing games.
Mr. McFarren you have had every opportunity to respond to me but you're leaving it in tha hands of a lawyer who has already detached herself from my plight here. I will not tolerate insolence.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 8, 2024, 3:08 PM
subject: RE: Failed Contact #3
mailed-by: gmail.com
You guys keep doing everything to avoid me and I don't think you're that busy. You're just trying to help the prosecutor succeed in prejudice towards me.
There's no excuse for failing to defend my rights as requested time and time again amidst an obvious uneven application of law. I am going to file my complaint with the Commission on Judicial Performance because this disparate treatment is absolutely uncalled for.
Just because I'm upset does not negate my rights any more than tha severity of injury negates the alleged victim's criminal liability. Crime is crime and prosecutors have a duty and obligation to uphold these principles.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
cc: Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 8, 2024, 3:19 PM
subject: RE: Failed Contact #3
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I have offered you whatever availability I have in my calendar. I am available for a phone meeting on Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 11:15 AM. I have another meeting starting at 12. Are you available to meet via phone at that time?
Thank you,
Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 8, 2024, 3:24 PM
subject: Re: Failed Contact #3
mailed-by: gmail.com
You're asking a question I already answered. This is basically your way of denying me due process without saying it.
Meeting or not you need to be prepared to preserve my rights on tha record 2/14 no exceptions so we can proceed smoothly with this case together or cause further dissension in my life by gaslighting me to my face. The least you can do is do it to build my confidence back in your office.
It's not one or tha other. It's both. Diversion AND tha challenge to tha application of law. For better or worse.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 9, 2024, 7:19 AM
subject: RE: Your Legal Reminders
mailed-by: gmail.com
We want the complete demographic report for zip code 91204 offered by zipatlas. I'd appreciate a response on this request please.
If a public defender fails to adequately defend their client's constitutional rights during pretrial, it could be considered a denial of due process. Defendants have the right to effective assistance of counsel, and if this right is not upheld, it may result in an unfair outcome and violate the principles of due process guaranteed by the Constitution.
A defendant still has the right to assert their rights on the record during pretrial proceedings, even if their lawyer disagrees. Ultimately, it is the defendant's decision whether to assert their rights, and their lawyer's role is to provide guidance and advice. However, if there is a disagreement between the defendant and their lawyer, the defendant may choose to proceed in asserting their rights despite their lawyer's opinion.
The principle of equal protection applies to all individuals, including defendants, regardless of whether they have been accused of committing a crime or not. Equal protection under the law ensures that all individuals are treated fairly and equally by the legal system, regardless of their circumstances or background. This principle is a fundamental aspect of the U.S. Constitution and is intended to prevent discrimination and ensure justice for all.
The principle of equal protection under the law requires that individuals be treated fairly and without discrimination by the legal system, regardless of their race or the severity of their injuries. If a defendant is being charged based solely on speculation while alleged victims of another race remain uncharged for similar conduct, it could raise concerns about unequal treatment and potential discrimination. The severity of injuries suffered by the parties involved does not negate the defendant's right to equal protection under the law. All individuals should be afforded the same legal protections and due process regardless of their circumstances.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Samantha Arensdorff <SArensdorff@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Noah Cox <NCox@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Feb 13, 2024, 11:06 AM
subject: RE: Case Law examples
mailed-by: gmail.com
Good morning.
For whatever it's worth, I have researched and found almost 30 case law examples particularly in California Supreme Court that directly challenges the charges against me. There are far more of these that reaffirm and emphasize duties of prosecutors regarding charging decisions. These are what I was able to gather over tha weekend leading up to our meeting here in a bit.
I understand you guys are more inclined to do a deal with tha devil, but I will not be refused due process or effective counsel.
Cases are as follows:
People vs Woods 1992
People vs. Antick 1975
People vs Prettyman 1996
People vs McCoy 2001
People vs Yarber 2017
People vs Montoya 1994
People vs Caldwell 1984
People vs Willard 2018
People vs Reyes 1997
People vs Paredes 2009
People vs Kauffman 1907
People vs Durham 1969
People vs Escobar 1992
People vs Luparello 1986
People vs Beeman 1984
People vs Favor 2012
People vs Zendejas 1987
People vs Turner 2017
People vs Eubanks 1996
People vs Watson 1981
People vs Smallwood 2016
People vs Smith 2003
People vs Sengpadychith 2001
People vs Johnson 2008
People vs Nelson 2010
People vs Hammond 2008
People vs Richardson 2015
I'd like these cases to be explored as soon as possible.
Please remember, officers of the court have an obligation and duty to UPHOLD rights of defendants, not to undermine them. Your usual way of conducting business is unsatisfactory if it goes against lawful principles. Public defenders have the same responsibilities as private attorneys in regard to effective counsel and zealous representation.
How could all this case law exist and you guys utterly fail to explore or investigate all legal avenues if I'm not being prejudiced by my own defense?
I want answers to my questions please. No exemptions. I have a right to know and understand the nature of charges against me.
Thank you.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
⬇️⬇️⬇️
2/14/24
[PC 730 COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT]"FILED
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
FEB 28 2024
David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court
BY: M. Alaberkyan, Deputy
Pietro "Piero" D'Ingillo, Psy.D
Clinical and Forensic Psychologist- CA License 19141
200 East Colorado Boulevard, Suite 200 Pasadena, CA 91101
Cell 323-573-0191
Fax 310-295-3131
pdingillo@aol.com
PC 730 EVALUATION
February 22, 2024
Hon. Suzette Clover, Judge
Los Angeles Superior Court
Pasadena, Dept. F
300 N. Walnut St.
Pasadena, CA 91101
RE: TAYLOR, Michael
Case No.: GA111132
Counsel for Petitioner: The People of the State of California
Counsel for Respondent: D. Daroca, Deputy Public Defender
DOB: 01/19/1990
Date of Evaluation: 01/05/2024 and 01/18/2024
Dear Judge Clover:
Pursuant to the Minute Order dated 10/02/2024, I have evaluated Mr. Taylor for the purpose of a Penal Code (PC) 730 Competency Assessment.
Statement of Non-Confidentiality: The defendant was explained and understood
aspects of non-confidentiality inherent in this evaluation. He comprehended that a
report will be written for the Court discussing our interview.
Sources of Information: The following data was reviewed prior to telephonically
interviewing the defendant on 01/05/2024 and 01/18/2024, as he is living in Seattle,
Washington. E-mail correspondence from Ms. Daroca, Minute Order, Arrest Report and
Medical Records.
Summary of Opinion:
A. The defendant has a major mental disease, disorder, or defect.
B. The defendant is not competent (see report).
Background Information:
Per DPD Daroca, Mr. Taylor has been diagnosed with a neurological condition and during interactions with her, he has exhibited questionable reasoning and impulse control. Past attorney and client interactions have required termination because the defendant engaged emotionally explosively and insultingly towards his defense counsel.
DPD Daroca forwarded to this examiner an email message sent to her by the defendant on 01/09/2024. This occurred after the telephonic interview involving the defendant and this examiner, which took place on 01/05/2024. Mr. Taylor indicates in the email message that he is being intentionally poorly represented by defense counsel. He expands his dissatisfaction and skepticism of receiving proper legal representation to his belief that most of the deputy public defender attorneys in the Public Defender’s Office are practicing C*tholics. In an illogical change of topic of discussion, he describes:
> “C*tholics are bold and blasphemous people who give themselves authority to alter the oracles of God. C*tholics changed the sabbath day and politicizes religion beyond its normal context. In basic terms, being catholic or merely having a c*tholic past tells me you can wash people up and not lose sleep over it. C*tholics think they are saved by their rituals which is why you guys think all you have to do is steamroll me and nobody really cares. You tell me the bare minimum and instead of making sure I understand, you only care that you covered your basis. C*tholicism is a wrong religion. It’s based on lies deceit and falsehoods just like the charges against me who come from other C*tholics in the prosecutor’s office. Yall all just a bunch of Roman C*tholics who do the devil’s bidding.”
>
The defendant is currently charged with:
-Attempted Murder
Summary of Arrest Report
On 11/16/2021, police officers responded to a call of a person being dragged by a car and the vehicle involved had left the scene. The male victim sustained major injuries and was transported to the hospital. According to a witness, the driver was parking his car in a parking lot and struck the side of another parked car. The driver tried leaving the scene, but was confronted by one of the occupants of the car that had been struck. The driver reportedly refused to remain on scene and the man from the car that had been struck tried various methods to prevent him from leaving. The driver reportedly struck the man and caused him injuries. The car of the defendant was later found empty near the location of the incident and the defendant was also identified, and ultimately detained for questioning.
Signed: Dr. Pietro D’Ingillo"
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
2/14/24
[MINUTE ORDER]
"SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Criminal Division
Pasadena Dept. - F
XNEGA111132-01
The People of the State of California
vs.
TAYLOR, MICHAEL BERNARD J
Honorable Suzette Clover, Judge
J. Diaz, Judicial Assistant
February 14, 2024
8:30 AM
Verlaine Turner (#6201), Court Reporter
PC664-187(a), VC20001(b)(2), VC20002(a)
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Pretrial Conference/Trial Setting
The following parties are present for the aforementioned proceeding:
MICHAEL BERNARD J TAYLOR, Defendant
Danielle Marie Bell, Deputy Public Defender
William S. Park, Deputy District Attorney
The matter is called for Pretrial Conference/Trial Setting.
Defense counsel declares a doubt as to the Defendant's mental competence pursuant to Penal Code section 1368. Criminal proceedings are suspended.
A county approved psychiatrist is appointed pursuant to Evidence Code section 730 to examine the Defendant and prepare a report on the Defendant's current mental status within the meaning of Penal Code section 1368.
The Court orders the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department to allow the appointed doctor(s) to have access to a laptop computer during the interview.
A packet of documents including a copy of the minute order declaring a doubt, a copy of the accusatory pleading (complaint, information, or citation), a copy of the arrest report, a copy of the booking (if the defendant is out of custody on bond), and a copy of Los Angeles County Pretrial Release Program form (LOSC CRIM 302) (if the defendant is out of custody on Supervised Released Program) is ordered transferred to the Mental Health Division via the case management system to the Mental Health resource account within 24 hours of this order.
A copy of the arrest report must be sent separately to the Mental Health Division via the Mental Health resource account.
Defense counsel states that the defendant is unable to assist her with this case and declares a doubt.
The people's oral request for the defendant to be remanded is heard, argued, and denied.
Defendant is admonished to keep in contact with their attorney if there is any issues.
On Court's motion, 1368 PC Competency Hearing is set for Wednesday, February 28, 2024, at 8:30 AM in Hollywood Mental Health PC1368.
The Defendant is ordered to return on the above date. Defendant Bond Posted. Cash Bail : LAB672360002, Bond to Stand"
On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 2:22 PM Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com> wrote:
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 4, 2023, 9:05 AMmailed-by: gmail.com
I'll see you at tha office later today. Better get your fucking stories straight because I am not happy.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>cc: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 4, 2023, 12:25 PMsubject: RE:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I have just received your emails from over the last week. As my email away message advised, I was out of the office until today. The nature of my absence is and was a private matter and I will not be providing you with any additional information with regards to the particular reasons. I advised you previously that the use of profane language, threats and insults will not be tolerated under any terms. Please be aware that Mr. Lilienfeld is no longer my head deputy and was recently transferred. I have cc’d my new supervisor, Mr. Kristoffer McFarren, to this email.
I understand you are frustrated. I have had a chance to review your emails. First, I would advise against you filing a police report against the witnesses on your case. I understand that their tik-tok videos have caused you great distress, but I don’t believe filing a report is the prudent thing to do at this point. This is my advice to you regarding this matter.
I don’t understand what you mean when you say that I have “steamrolled [you] out of every opportunity to present a defense”. I have explained to you, on many occasions, that you have the right to go to trial. We have discussed it via email, in person and via telephone. It’s simply not true that I am keeping you from putting on a defense.
I have also advised that any arguments at trial could include any racial inequities that are involved in this case.
You have made the decision, per multiple prior emails, to pursue mental health diversion in this case because you advised me that you believed it was in your best interest. Is this no longer the case? Are you interested in pursuing trial at this point? Please understand that I am here to help you, but I’m not always available the exact moment you require my attention.
Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 4, 2023, 12:43 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
No one is making threats. We all have a right to be upset.
I shouldn't be going to trial under these circumstances. Overlooking the obviously malicious crimes against my person and property just to see whether I "might have" committed a crime makes no sense to me unless it's racially motivated, an issue that needs to be addressed here and now, while in pretrial stages.
Addressing these concerns while pursuing mental health diversion ought not to be mutually exclusive. I don't feel like you guys are even asking enough questions to judge whether or not they are even tha right questions. How could you have your mind made up so much to not ask any further questions? It's because your office is working together to help tha prosecutor not be embarrassed by their improper charging.
Why would you discourage me from doing everything that advocates for my case? Why are you steamrolling me on what the penal code already says? Why would you wilfully spend taxpayer dollars for doctors examining me when I was the one attacked by two adult men from another race in a city that is 35%-43% Armenian? I can't be wrong on all these statutes but your office is working to make sure I'm exhausted of any opportunity at a strong defense because you're really in this to help tha prosecutor.
Why else would you be so comfortable reminding me I can go to trial as if you can't see tha circumstances are improper?
Why can't you stand up defend and protect tha constitutional rights I already have? It's not that I'm wrong. It's just that your office has a conflict of interest. And that is absolutely ineffective counsel.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 4, 2023, 1:38 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
How are you going to advise me not to file a police report when my name in included in those threats against my life!?
Because you are helping the district attorney protect criminals just like Ron DeSantis said.
What is the agenda here and why are you playing along? Can we set up a meeting before court please?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 4, 2023, 2:51 PMsubject: RE: Re:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
There are many reasons why I would advise you not to file a police report. However, the two main reasons why I would caution against it are as follows: (1) following the witness on any form of social media may be seen as a violation of the protective order by the court, and (2) some of these statements made against you may be helpful in the resolution of your case with the DA and also on cross-examination, should we get to that point. I am trying to balance protecting defense of your case and your rights as best I can.
As I’ve said many times before, I don’t work with the prosecutors. I’m not conspiring against you. I have never worked with the DA against my clients and I’m not doing that now. You said that you wanted to pursue mental health diversion, so I have done my best to facilitate that. Participating in mental health diversion necessarily means that you have a discussion with a doctor that is court appointed, hence, the funding by the court. I am doing exactly what you asked of me.
I am comfortable reminding you that you have the right to trial because you do and as your lawyer, I have the obligation to advise and explain your rights as this process plays out. Participating in diversion is a choice and one that you should not take lightly. If you don’t want to participate in diversion, we can pursue trial. If you don’t want trial, then we pursue diversion. As I’ve said many times before, those are the options.
Lastly, you are entitled to your feelings. However, your feelings do not entitle you to treat me as you have. I’m available to meet with you on the following dates:
12/11/23 at 2pm12/12/23 at 2pm12/13/23 at 2 pm12/14/23 at 9 AM, 10 AM or 2 PM.
Hopefully one of these dates works with your schedule.
Sincerely,
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 4, 2023, 4:56 PMsubject: Re: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
It's not my fault he used his government name that's involved in a pending case. I'm going to make the report because regardless of how you lawyers want to interpret stuff I have to protect myself. The prosecutor is absolutely defending a criminal and it's unlawful.
If a prosecutor is charging a defendant for speculation while overlooking or not charging the attackers for their crimes against the defendant's person and property, it might indicate an inconsistency or bias in the legal proceedings. This situation could raise questions about the fairness and objectivity of the legal process, as it seems to prioritize one aspect while neglecting another, potentially leading to an unfair outcome for the defendant. Why is this so hard to understand?
December 11th at 2p please thank you
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 5, 2023, 8:50 AMsubject: Re: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
This was not a sentiment. I'd like a clarified explanation for this question please.
If a prosecutor is charging a defendant for speculation while overlooking or not charging the attackers for their crimes against the defendant's person and property, it might indicate an inconsistency or bias in the legal proceedings. This situation could raise questions about the fairness and objectivity of the legal process, as it seems to prioritize one aspect while neglecting another, potentially leading to an unfair outcome for the defendant. Why is this so hard to understand? How can the court say that one person has a right to attack another and not tha other way around?
The courts are exercising authorities they do not have. Please clarify this for me. How do I, an American citizen, not have protections in place? It's because they're running w a false narrative to prejudice my defense! Don't act like you don't know.
Please answer my question thoroughly. Do not be vague in your answer please.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 5, 2023, 10:19 AMsubject: Re: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
This will not be a fair trial if I go to trial alone. If I am the only one to answer at trial, it is already an unfair trial. There are already too many protections in place that your office isn't exploring and that is not a zealous defense.
No need in justifying your hard work on my behalf. We both know that nature of your job may require you have more clients than you can handle on a given day
I know there is a way you guys are use to dealing with these cases. But, to insist that the court gets to "resolve" the case as if it isn't already unfair is pure hostility. For me to go to trial alone is unlawful for the simple fact that
If I am facing charges because of crime, if this is about the committing of a crime, why are my attackers not charged? Why does it matter whether or not I committed a crime or not if you're not going to charge us all for public offenses?
These charges go directly against ethical standards of prosecutors and are absolutely inconsistent with the principles of justice.
I disagree that I only have two options. Those are tha only two options "you want" to offer me but those are not real options. Telling me if I don't like something for being unfair then I can choose to go to trial unfairly. What type of option is that!?
Let me remind you. I am a citizen of the United States of America. You mean to tell me that between the Federal constitution, the state constitution, and the California penal code that I don't have any potential challenge to tha charges against me? None? Why do you insist ensuring due process while implicitly violating equal protection?
Going to trial means I am answering for a crime. But, to allow my attackers to not answer for their intentional crimes against me means I am being charged by improper factors. Whether I committed a crime or not doesn't change tha fact that these two men reacted wit violence to a traffic accident! That's absolutely unlawful! You need to get your shit together and quit fooling around! Prosecutors can't charge people just because they want to.
I'm upset because I have too many protections in place and your lame defenses are not helping me. Meanwhile, these circumstances are driving my business in the ground and it's keeping me in dangerous places to live. So excuse me if I get tired of your fucking around while you yourself is at ease of any prejudice treatment. It's like a privilege to be treated with decency in this God forsaken state. You and yo lame governor sucks bro. Ain't no way this bullshit case was supposed to drag out this fucking long.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 5, 2023, 12:06 PMsubject: Re: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
If there is a protective order for the alleged victim or complaining witness, I'd like a copy of it please.
Since the guy is threatening me directly by using my first and last name I'd argue he's the one defying such protective order. In one breath you're saying he has a right to attack me and get away with it while in another breath are also saying he enjoys immunity for making direct criminal threats.
How much malice do we have to prove while still in pretrial for you guys to step up to tha plate and fulfill your obligations to your client?
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 11, 2023, 1:32 PMmailed-by: gmail.com
Good afternoon, Ms. Bell.
I'm across the street at the central library. Can we meet briefly in front of courthouse. I just don't feel comfortable going into the courthouse before my court date. It would be nice to meet your new supervisor by the way.
Let me know please.
Thanks
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 11, 2023, 1:45 PMsubject: RE:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Hi Mr. Taylor,
Thanks for coming all the way to Pasadena to meet with us. Unfortunately, I’m not able to meet you outside of the building. My supervisor can meet you at the entrance and walk with you up to our office, but we won’t be able to meet with you outside. I apologize for the inconvenience.
Thank you,Danielle
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Dec 11, 2023, 1:48 PMsubject: RE:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Good afternoon, Mr. Taylor.I am on site today and look forward to meeting you in our office.I am sure it goes without saying that you are in very capable hands with Ms. Bell on your case.
Sincerely,Kris G McFarren
Kristoffer G. McFarren (He/Him/His)Head Deputy – Pasadena Branch & Area OfficesLos Angeles County Public Defender300 E. Walnut Street, Suite 311Pasadena, California 91101(626) 356-5484
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 11, 2023, 1:54 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
Ok I'll come up. Thanks for your timely response.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 11, 2023, 3:18 PMsubject: RE: Tantrumsmailed-by: gmail.com
Good afternoon, Ms. Bell.
Tantrums by my lawyer will not be tolerated on my defense team. I can't just waltz out of this problem so you shouldn't just walk out of a meeting I called for clarification please.
Thank you for your time today. But I do not appreciate you abruptly walking out after admitting your court appearances were already finished for the day.
From here on out we running a tight ship. No exceptions.
Thank you and have a great day.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 11, 2023, 3:57 PMsubject: RE: Tantrumsmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I respectfully disagree with the characterizations in your email. I asked you to give me time to speak so that I may adequately answer your questions, you did not. On numerous occasions, you talked over me and raised your voice to do so. You justified your treatment of me, using profanity and insulting me, stating, “this is why you’re talked to the way you are” based on your dissatisfaction with the way your case is charged. As I’ve stated numerous times before, I will not tolerate being disrespected. Setting a boundary is not a tantrum. I’m not quite sure what you mean when you say, “we running a tight ship. No exceptions”. Please provide some clarity.
Finally, I noticed that you elected not to copy my head deputy, Mr. Kris McFarren, to your email to me. Please be sure to do so in the future.
Sincerely,Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 11, 2023, 3:58 PMsubject: Re: Tantrumsmailed-by: gmail.com
If I don't like what the judge says I don't have a right to just storm out of the courtroom.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 11, 2023, 5:23 PMsubject: Re: Tantrumsmailed-by: gmail.com
You will not refuse me on my insistence to defend my constitutional rights. When we go to court, I will inform the judge that the public defenders office is refusing to defend my constitutional rights against my wishes.
The law already justifies me and I'm going to stand on that. If you don't like it you can reassign yourself, respectfully.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 12, 2023, 10:52 AMsubject: RE: Tantrumsmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Hello Mr. Taylor,
I am sorry to inform you that I tested positive for Covid this morning. I was feeling fine yesterday and was not having any symptoms. I tested myself because a family member tested positive. I am sorry to have exposed you and sincerely hope that both you and Mr. McFarren remain negative for covid-19.
Thank you,
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 12, 2023, 10:59 AMsubject: Re: Tantrumsmailed-by: gmail.com
Good morning, Ms. Bell.
I'm sorry to hear that. Please take time for adequate rest and self-care and get well soon.
I apologize if I may have caused you any additional stress.
Blessings
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,Kristoffer McFarren <KMcfarren@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Dec 12, 2023, 11:51 AMsubject: RE: Tantrumsmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Thank you, Mr. Taylor.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2026, 1:18 PM Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com> wrote:
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 23, 2023, 8:09 AM
subject: RE: Commission on Judicial Performance
mailed-by: gmail.com
Good morning Danielle and Casey.
Below is a complaint I've drafted to report to the State of California Commission on Judicial Performance. Please understand that I am just trying to cover my bases and fight for my life. Please don't get offended that I'm putting in time on my defense when others might not.
Please review and advise on how such a letter might impact my case. Thank you.
"Court acted in concert with prosecution and public defenders office in selling defendant's vehicle without proper notice while it is evidence in the case against him. The judge revoking the defendant's driving privileges as a condition of bail prevented the defendant from accessing his mailbox to receive any such notice as driving was his primary method for income and his vehicle was registered to a business he owns in another state. Public defender did inform the court of the defendant's need to operate a vehicle for work, however, they neglected to mention that the driving revocation bail condition would prevent defendant from accessing his own mailbox to receive such notice in event his property would be released for sale/auction while case is still pending. Furthermore, the defendant's lawyers persistent refusal to preserve their client's constitutional rights on the record against his wishes and better judgment in respects to any potential discrimination or unfair treatment in the application of law against him has prejudiced the defendant and is leading to a potential unjust outcome and an obvious presumption of guilt. Late in pretrial, the court failing to address the crimes committed against the defendant is an endorsing violation of the defendant's constitutional rights to due process and equal protection under the law. The court is attempting to hold the victim criminally liable in order to justify his attacker's civil injury claim by omitting obvious inferences and establishing a false premise of the case. The obvious criminal and malicious attacks against the defendant have not yet been addressed or lawfully justified at any point during this case. This complaint is being made in an effort to preserve the defendant's rights and raising concerns of potential discrimination in the charges against him because his public defenders have failed to raise such concerns since arraignment and preliminary. Department F in Pasadena Superior Court is presuming criminals, who were caught on video violating public safety and maliciously attacking another citizen, innocent while the speculative charges against the defendant is resulting in a high disparate impact. Prosecutor has failed to meet the burden of proof and has also neglected to clarify how charges against the defendant are consistent with the common government interest of protecting public order and safety. These charges are basically saying that the defendant's attackers had a legal right to physically harm another citizen, that it is ok to respond with violence to minor traffic infractions, or that because it happened in Glendale, CA and defendant's attackers were Armenian, the defendant should be held accountable and treated with implicit bias. Prosecutorial discretion should not be used to exercise a selective prosecution. Either you charge all 3 parties involved, or charges against defendant MUST be dropped. Otherwise, you are violating the defendant's right to due process and equal protection under the law. You cannot hold victims exclusively & criminally liable for their attacker's reckless negligence especially when the victim wasn't already involved in any criminal activity prior to time of incident. Prosecution and Glendale Police Department are conspiring against defendant to protect criminals who's activities are not constitutionally protected, while misusing resources and diverting attention from their actions to prejudice the defendant of a fair defense. If it wasn't already enough that the defendant can't afford private counsel, why must pleas for his constitutional rights under the law be inhibited by officers of the court? Instead, defendant's lawyers have spent extended amounts of time and county resources on doctors to examine their own client instead of challenging the prosecutor on their discriminatory charges against him. This represents a clear conflict of interest, denying the defendant a zealous defense due to the influence of public counsel having other cases against same prosecutors in the same court rooms with the same judges. This conflict of interest has resulted in ineffective assistance leading to a severe straining of defendant's access to adequate housing, gainful employment, and personal and professional relationships while out on bail. Further, public defenders office has made constant attempts to sabotage defendant's defense by arguing facts before the trier of law, omitting crucial details in his motions to dismiss, and constantly failing to address or challenge any potential discrimination in the charges against their client on the record."
https://cjp.ca.gov/online-complaint-form/
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 25, 2023, 9:54 AM
subject: RE: Commission on Judicial Performance
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Hi Mr. Taylor,
I hope you are doing well in Florida. I am sorry it took me until today to respond to your email. I have had time to review it and discuss it with Casey Lilienfeld. In our professional opinion, this is not a fruitful complaint to file at this time. I do not think it would be helpful in the ultimate resolution of your case. I know that Judge Clover’s decision regarding your bail conditions is a great source of frustration and anger for you, which Casey and I both share, however, I do believe that she will grant your mental health diversion motion. Candidly, I’m not sure that there are many other judges that would be willing to do so. My only goal as your attorney is to continue to represent you to the best of my ability and I think it’s my duty to advise you not to send in this complaint.
I am open to discussing with you other ways to bring to light your frustrations about this case, while also keeping in mind that, in my opinion, diversion is still the best path forward.
As always, please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns.
Thank you,
Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 25, 2023, 10:06 AM
subject: Re: Commission on Judicial Performance
mailed-by: gmail.com
Ok, thank you for your response. Do you think the letter won't have any influence at all in this case? Is it still not worthwhile to have it recorded? If I file such complaint, do you think, in your professional opinion, that it might influence tha judge's decision concerning diversion?
If my attackers committed crime before injuries were sustained, how exactly are they legally justified? The charges basically say that criminals had a right to attack me and enjoy immunity.
As much as I personally feel I could benefit from diversion, it's not a righteous resolution to this case. I shouldn't be charged just because they want to. Charges should reflect evidence as it pertains to the law.
Why should the law benefit from my misery? I had no bad intentions nor did I break any law outside of a traffic infraction. Who is tha law to step in my affairs to tell me that I'm wrong for being attacked and scared for my life and should be charged for it while those who CLEARLY attacked me gets to capitalize on my disposition?
These charges are un-American and quite frankly the prosecutor is exercising powers they don't even have unless they're willing to admit their discretion supercedes legislation.
I honestly feel like my best option is to represent myself so I can say what you guys have refused to say all this time. That the application of law is discriminatory! Why is that so difficult to address? Just because it gets addressed doesn't mean I have to like tha answer. But, to ignore it outright only furthers my suspicions of this legal process.
Sheriffs downstairs agreed that my rights should be respected so why does tha court see it differently? What exactly is keeping me from accessing tha constitutional rights already afforded to me? If prosecutors can file charges on whoever they want, then this is not a free country.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 31, 2023, 5:29 AM
subject: RE: FYI
mailed-by: gmail.com
Good morning
Just FYI
I'm going to send the footage of this incident to all local news tip lines this morning.
I believe the charges against me are outright discriminative and I can't fathom sitting around for another 3 full months while I can't even make money to support myself.
Victims shouldn't be charged with crimes. And I believe the prosecutor is exercising powers they don't have while hiding behind their so-called discretion.
The prosecutors office is fucking my life up by accusing me of shit they're not even sure of. They're charging me simply because they want to and not because it's justified.
If I was attacked, why should tha government get to profit off my misery and disposition? Why?
Why should I be held accountable for the poor decisions of another person?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 31, 2023, 7:57 AM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I realize you are angry and I share that sentiment, however, you may not disseminate discovery to local news organizations or any outside organizations for that matter. You cannot share it. Doing so could subject you to additional liability.
Dr. D’Ingillo will be calling you by the end of the week. Please keep me updated about your conversations.
Sincerely,
Danielle Daroca Bell
Get Outlook for iOS
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 31, 2023, 8:11 AM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: gmail.com
Who cares that it was discovery? Please inform me on the rules and procedures of taking such action.
The video shows me being attacked. My face has already been put in the news so explain the potential additional liabilities to me please. What are you guys trying to hide? The fact that these 2 Armenians in Glendale attacked me and you can't afford for tha public to see it? If the public can see my mug shot in mainstream news why can't they also see I was attacked by 2 criminals? You guys are trying hard to play me and prejudice me.
Every time you respond to me you are pretty vague in your meanings. Explain tha additional liability please. What are the additional liabilities? If I'm already presumed guilty, my business and family relationships in ruins, what more damage could hurt me?
You still have not responded or clarified my question about my the letter to judicial performance not having any influence at all in my case.
Do not waste my time with vagueness. I need you to be crystal clear when you explain things to me. You must anticipate that I am reading between the lines. I hear what people say but I pay attention to what they do. Don't play with me. I need the full ramifications please.
The video doesn't contain any private information. It's tha same video that anyone can make a request for whether approved or not.
I want answers today please. Thank you.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 31, 2023, 8:38 AM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: gmail.com
Perhaps if you can explain to me how I'm not being prejudiced in this case I can stop making things difficult for you. I'm not tha one with the law background. I need you to help me understand this process so that I don't get in my own way.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 31, 2023, 12:03 PM
subject: RE: FYI
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I have only ever had your best interest at heart. I know you don’t agree, but I promise you, that is the truth. I want to be as clear as I can in my legal advice to you going forward:
You have the absolute right to go to trial on this case. I would never stand in the way of that. If it is trial that you choose, then I will prepare to zealously represent you. We have talked about the strengths and weaknesses of your case and I am available to speak to you again about that . I can never guarantee an outcome at trial, no matter how strong I view the defense’s case.
You also have the option of mental health diversion. If you choose this path, you will receive the mental health treatment you have said you need. You will also earn an complete DISMISSAL of your case and sealing of your record. This would be a great outcome, but only if you want to do it. It comes without the risks of trial.
I do NOT believe that disseminating evidence to news outlets would be helpful or serve you in your case. I know you want to express the grave inequality you have experienced as a result of this case and I understand that, but I do not think this is the best way to accomplish this. I do not believe that releasing such information would be helpful in accomplishing any of the goals you have for yourself and you may, in the process, sabotage your own ability to (1) obtain a grant of mental health diversion (if that’s what you wish) or (2) taint a jury pool against you, this is what I was referring to when I said open yourself up to additional liabilities.
I am not trying to do anything in this case, except for protect you to the best of my abilities. As always, please feel free to respond with any questions or comments you have.
Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 31, 2023, 12:15 PM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: gmail.com
Ok, Ms. Bell.
Thank you for helping me understand. Let's continue with pursuing MH diversion. I'm going to do everything in my power to keep composed between now and the next court date.
I apologize for any frustration I've caused. Thank you for your continued patience with me.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 31, 2023, 12:59 PM
subject: RE: FYI
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
There is no reason to apologize Mr. Taylor. There is no way for me to possibly know the weight you are carrying with this case. I want you to know, however, that I am here, to walk this path with you however I can and defend you to the best of me ability. That is and will remain my only priority and goal.
Please keep me updated as to when you speak to Dr. D’Ingillo.
Thanks,
Danielle
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Nov 1, 2023, 8:57 AM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: gmail.com
Do you think my behavior up to this point might compromise the judge's decision in granting me diversion? Because if she denies me diversion, I just can't fathom such disappointment.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Nov 1, 2023, 1:12 PM
subject: RE: FYI
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Hi Mr. Taylor,
I do not think that your behavior has compromised the Judge’s decision at this point. However, she could change her mind if there is reason to believe that you will not comply with diversion. I encourage you to consider that in the future.
The only thing you can do, going forward, is to cooperate with the doctor and put yourself in the best possible position for a grant of diversion. I think that Judge Clover believes mental health diversion to be a very equitable outcome in this case, so I believe that she will grant it. I have not heard otherwise.
I also want to reiterate that neither myself, nor Casey, would ever share anything with the judge or DA that is privileged. Any communication between you and me or Casey is strictly between us. She would never be advised of any communication between us. For that reason, I would strongly encourage you, if there is something that is bothering you or upsetting you, to please reach out to us first, before you reach out to the Judge’s staff. Any communication with the Judge’s staff will be shared with the Judge.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Nov 1, 2023, 3:19 PM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: gmail.com
Is Judge Clover aware of my outburst after last court date? A part of me just feels like she might deny the diversion motion tha same way she's denied all my motions up to this point.
The doctor just contacted me. He asked me some general questions and said he was going to touch base with you before setting up a telephone appointment.
Please advise as necessary.
Thank you
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
date: Nov 2, 2023, 9:44 AM
subject: RE: FYI
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I do believe that Judge Clover is aware of what transpired on the last court date, however, I have not spoken to her about it personally. Thank you for letting me know Dr. D’Ingillo called you. I have not heard from him, but I will reach out.
Thank you,
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Nov 2, 2023, 9:52 AM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: gmail.com
Can you clarify this for me please?
"Is it a violation of due process if a defendant goes to trial under a presumption of guilt?
Yes, it is generally a violation of due process if a defendant goes to trial under a presumption of guilt. The principle of "innocent until proven guilty" is a fundamental aspect of due process in many legal systems. It ensures that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Starting a trial with a presumption of guilt would undermine this fundamental principle and deprive the defendant of a fair trial."
Just because I may want to go to trial doesn't mean I should go to trial under circumstances where my attackers enjoy immunity for their obvious crimes against me.
Please help me understand how me going to trial under these circumstances wouldn't be a presumption of guilt.
Thank you
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Nov 2, 2023, 11:41 AM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
Every Defendant in the U.S. is entitled to the Presumption of Innocence. This means that the jury must presume the person innocent unless or until the People have proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt. Your trial would be no different, if you choose to have a trial. I know you disagree with the way this case is charged. I do too. I told the prosecutor that today when I saw him on a hearing for another case. However, I do not get to decide how to charge defendants. Unfortunately, neither do you.
Regardless of how you or I view the facts, you would not be subject to a presumption of guilt. The court would instruct the jury that they MUST presume you are innocent unless the People prove the truth of the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. This is also part of the jury selection process. If there is an individual who says they cannot follow the law, they will not be allowed to sit on the jury. In their analysis of the facts, the jury would consider the conduct of other individuals connected with the case, such as the complaining witnesses, other percipient witnesses and the police, to name a few. They may find the conduct of the complaining witnesses was not lawful and find for you. They may find the opposite is true.
I know you are dissatisfied with how the case is charged. I share that sentiment. I need you to remain calm and focused, either on preparing for diversion or trial. Please do not contact any outside agencies, including the DA or the Judge. You need to make good decisions that serve you well and try as best you can to not let your emotions get the best of you. I know this is a very difficult experience. Please let me know if you have questions or concerns.
Thank you,
Danielle
Get Outlook for iOS
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Nov 2, 2023, 11:44 AM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: gmail.com
Ok thank you for the clarification. The lawyer handling that lawsuit against me is requesting video footage of the incident. What should I do?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Nov 4, 2023, 2:07 PM
subject: RE: FYI
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Hi Mr. Taylor,
I can’t give you advice on the civil matter. However, have you contacted anyone from legal aid to see about representation? That might be a good place to start.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Alaska Airlines <MobileWebBoardingPass@alaskaair.com>
to: michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com
date: Nov 4, 2023, 9:08 AM
subject: Alaska Airlines boarding pass for MIA - SEA on 11/4/2023
mailed-by: alaskaair.com
signed-by: alaskaair.com
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Your boarding passes
Confirmation code: IOODGY
Nov 04, 2023
MIA ➔ SEA
Flights
Alaska 305X Boarding Gate Group
MIA ➔ SEA 5:00 pm -- F
Passengers
Michael bernard Taylor
Seats
MIA ➔ SEA 13F
Miami to Seattle – AS 305
Nov 4, 2023, 5:40 PM–9:10 PM
Take-off
Nov 4, 2023, 5:40 PM
Landing
Nov 4, 2023, 9:10 PM
Flight duration
6 hr, 30 min
Passenger name
Michaelbernard Taylor
Seat
-
Confirmation number
IOODGY
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Nov 5, 2023, 1:12 AM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: gmail.com
I flew back to Seattle today. My fiancee and I decided not to proceed together due to the complications of the case. I'm not too disappointed.
This might be a stretch to ask but is it possible you can stand in for me on next court date? I'm only asking because I need to get a job out here that might require a commitment and
considering we are on the same page with pursuing diversion.
If the judge needs me to be present, I understand that, too and can travel back to LA for the court date.
Please let me know what you think I should do. My address remains the same at 77 S. Washington St. Seattle, WA 98104.
Thanks
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Nov 6, 2023, 12:14 PM
subject: RE: FYI
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Hi Mr. Taylor,
I’m sorry to hear about you and your fiancée. I’m glad to hear that you are doing OK. I think it would be best if you are present, but we still have some time before January. Hopefully you speak with Dr. D’Ingillo this week. Please keep me updated as to the progress there.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Nov 9, 2023, 11:29 AM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: gmail.com
Good morning.
I have a flight ticket back to Los Angeles this Monday. I'll be in town for the court date in January.
Thanks for being flexible with my schedule.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
date: Nov 16, 2023, 3:53 PM
subject: RE: FYI
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Thanks, Mr. Taylor. Have you spoken to Dr. D’Ingillo again? If not, I will follow up with him. Thank you!
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Nov 16, 2023, 3:54 PM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: gmail.com
Good afternoon, Ms. Bell
He has not followed up with me since last time we spoke.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
date: Nov 16, 2023, 3:55 PM
subject: RE: FYI
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
OK thanks for letting me know. I’m going to email him now and get an estimated time for evaluation. I’ll email you when I know more.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Nov 16, 2023, 3:56 PM
subject: Re: FYI
mailed-by: gmail.com
Ok, sound good. Thank you.
I am back in Los Angeles btw.
1759 E. 51st St.
Los Angeles, CA 90058
On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 12:12 PM Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com> wrote:
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 10, 2023, 3:02 PM
subject: Is a defendant required to cite the racial justice act to challenge an uneven application of law against him?
mailed-by: gmail.com
I think this case is everything I suspected.
"No, a defendant is not required to cite a specific act, such as the Racial Justice Act, to challenge an uneven application of the law. The defense's primary goal is to ensure that the legal proceedings are fair and just. If a defendant believes that they are facing uneven treatment or discrimination, they can raise these concerns through various legal arguments without necessarily citing a specific law.
Common legal avenues to challenge an uneven application of the law include:
1. **Equal Protection:** Arguing that the differential treatment violates the defendant's constitutional right to equal protection under the law.
2. **Due Process:** Asserting that the uneven application of the law denies the defendant due process, which includes fair treatment and a meaningful opportunity to present a defense.
3. **Selective Prosecution:** If applicable, claiming that the prosecution is selectively targeting the defendant for reasons unrelated to the merits of the case.
While laws like the Racial Justice Act may provide specific provisions related to challenging racial bias, a defendant can still raise broader constitutional and legal arguments without explicitly citing a particular statute."
Please explain the above to help me understand why I wouldn't have a path forward here exactly?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,
Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 12, 2023, 8:47 AM
subject: RE: Is a defendant required to cite the racial justice act to challenge an uneven application of law against him?
mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
signed-by: pubdef.lacounty.gov
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
Good morning, Mr. Taylor:
These are arguments that we might be able to bring before the Judge as a pre-trial motion. The challenge with the Racial Justice Act is that it requires us to prove that your case is different than similarly situated defendants. While I don’t doubt that there is a racial component with regard to how you have been charged, the set of facts in your case is so unique that finding a defendant in the same circumstances would prove to be exceedingly difficult. It is our position, after speaking to our office expert, that we would not survive the prima facie showing before the Judge. These constitutional challenges that you raise have been discussed several times at length. I do believe that some of these arguments could be persuasive in front of a jury.
In terms of a non-statutory motion to dismiss based on constitutional principles, I am working on pursuing such a motion in the event you decline mental health diversion. However, if mental health diversion is still the path forward you feel is most appropriate for you, I encourage you to continue working towards that. I am hopeful that Dr. D’Ingillo will make contact with you very soon to begin the evaluation.
Thank you very much and please take care. Travel safely this weekend.
Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 12, 2023, 11:46 AM
subject: Re: Is a defendant required to cite the racial justice act to challenge an uneven application of law against him?
mailed-by: gmail.com
Equal protection arguments generally involve claiming that individuals or groups are being treated unfairly or unequally by the government. In legal proceedings, defendants making equal protection arguments may need to demonstrate differential treatment either in their own case or by providing examples of disparate treatment in similar cases to support their claim. The focus is on showing that the government's actions result in unjustifiable distinctions and unequal treatment.
If a crime was committed against me on video and I'm being charged exclusively with speculation while my attackers remain uncharged, that is unequal treatment because whether I committed a crime or not doesn't even matter if tha crimes against my person are not addressed or lawfully justified.
The prosecutor does not have authority to protect criminals whose actions are not constitutionally protected by law while using unreasonable speculation to prejudice other people.
What makes my point here invalid concerning the law?
If my attackers broke the law without question, what gives the prosecutor tha right or authority to forego tha law to speculate against another?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,
Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>
date: Oct 12, 2023, 11:49 AM
subject: Re: Is a defendant required to cite the racial justice act to challenge an uneven application of law against him?
mailed-by: gmail.com
Prosecutorial discretion allows prosecutors to decide which cases to pursue, but it doesn't permit the intentional overlooking of crimes or undermining constitutional rights. Prosecutors are expected to act ethically and within the bounds of the law.
🛑🛑🛑
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: lucky2go <noreply-uk@lucky2go.com>
reply-to: noreply-uk@lucky2go.com
to: michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com
date: Oct 13, 2023, 10:44 PM
subject: Online check-in confirmation, booking no.: 7099713782
mailed-by: transactional.emaillabs.net.pl
signed-by: lucky2go.com
security: Standard encryption (TLS)
14.10.2023, 07:43
Welcome
Aboard,
MICHAEL
TAYLOR
This is your
Boarding Pass
Fold Pass So...
Barcode Faces Out.
BOARDING PASS
DATE 14Oct2023
TAYLOR,
MICHAEL
FROM: LAX
Los Angeles, CA
TO: FLL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
0 ** NO CARRY-ON BAG ** 0 CHECKED BAGS
SEQ # 043
CONFIRMATION
UFL9VV
FLIGHT NK 310
GATE
CHECK SCREENS
LOCATED IN
TERMINAL 5
BOARDING TIME
8:11 PM
DOORS CLOSE 15 MINUTES
PRIOR TO DEPARTURE.
ZONE
3
SEAT
27E
DEPARTS ARRIVES
Los Angeles, CA Fort Lauderdale, FL
8:56 PM 5:01 AM
Issued 10-14-2023 7:43 AM
On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 9:10 AM Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com> wrote:
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 12, 2023, 5:58 PMsubject: RE: Questionmailed-by: gmail.com
Question regarding mental health diversion.
Just out of curiosity. Is it possible to get a transfer for mental health services in Washington State if a MH diversion was accepted by all parties in a potential resolution of the case or will it absolutely have to be in California? I ask because I've heard about probation allowing formal transfers to another state while still being subject to conditions.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Sep 12, 2023, 7:20 PMsubject: Re: Questionmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Yes- that is possible. I would venture to say it is likely, as long as the court (1) grants mental health diversion in the first place and (2) we are able to secure a mental health treatment provider who is willing to provide progress reports electronically to the court on a quarterly basis.
Probation transfers involve actual transfer of the case to a different jurisdiction after a conviction has been entered. The difference here is that with diversion, the case remains technically open for the granting court to dismiss upon completion of the diversionary period. Therefore, I’m not sure the court would agree to transfer the diversion to Washington. However, if the court were inclined to grant diversion, then I know she wouldn’t have a problem with an out of state treatment program while she monitored progress from here.
I hope this answers your question.
Is mental health diversion an option you are open to?
Get Outlook for iOS
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 12, 2023, 7:46 PMsubject: Re: Questionmailed-by: gmail.com
Please let me sleep on it. If the court considered the diversion, do you think the judge would sustain my driving privileges being revoked?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Sep 12, 2023, 8:33 PMsubject: Re: Questionmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
I believe so, yes.
Get Outlook for iOS
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 13, 2023, 8:29 AMsubject: Re: Questionmailed-by: gmail.com
Good morning, Ms. Bell.
Would you say a MH diversion is my best option in terms of avoiding prison? How likely do you think the court and tha prosecutor would agree with it? Does it also mean there can be no countersuit?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 13, 2023, 12:28 PMsubject: RE: Questionmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Hi Mr. Taylor,
MH Diversion definitely helps you avoid prison as long as you are in good standing, meaning, you are fulfilling your obligations to the court. The diversion period would be two years. I do think there is a good chance that the court would grant diversion in your case. A Diversion motion would require a psychological evaluation with a doctor that I would ask the court to appoint at no cost to you. The doctor would evaluate you with specific parameters addressing the factors for diversion set forth in PC 1001.36. Once we have that evaluation, I would prepare a motion, based on the evaluation of the psychologist appointed. The court would rule on the motion. I think you have a great shot at getting mental health diversion in this case, but I cannot guarantee it with 100% certainty.
I do not believe mental health diversion precludes you from filing a counter-suit. However, that would be a civil matter, so I would advise you to consult with a civil attorney with regards to that as I am not permitted to advise on civil court matters.
I hope this answers your questions. I am working on sending you the photos you requested.
Thank you,Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 13, 2023, 1:17 PMsubject: Re: Questionmailed-by: gmail.com
Ok, thank you. But, before the court considers it, does the prosecutor have to agree first and if so, what would you say is the likelihood of them agreeing to it in my case?
As strongly as I feel about my innocence, I don't want to fight in court. Instead, I realize the significance of Michael Y.'s injuries and I want to be a part of the solution. I feel bad for what happened because even tho it was an inadvertent accident, his life is changed forever and I am absolutely sympathetic to that. I actually see a MH Diversion as a tremendous opportunity to get the treatment I need for my own daily balance w/o the financial cost. Just being honest with myself about my mental health conditions.
I think we should go ahead and pursue the MH Diversion.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Sep 13, 2023, 2:17 PMsubject: Re: Questionmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
I respect that very much, Mr. Taylor and I understand. I know how much this case has been weighing on you and affecting your life and it sounds like you’ve taken the time to consider all of your options.
The DA does NOT have to agree in order for the court to grant diversion. Your case is serious but I also think the DA’s recognize that there are certain equities involved that would render diversion a just outcome. I can’t say for sure but that’s the impression I get from speaking to the DA.
In light of your decision to pursue mental health diversion, I will get a doctor appointed to speak to you- hopefully by phone prior to 10/3. It just depends on how busy they are but I will certainly impress upon who I select that we are looking to get this done sooner than later. I will keep you updated.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Danielle Daroca Bell
Get Outlook for iOS
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 13, 2023, 2:34 PMsubject: Re: Questionmailed-by: gmail.com
Ok, sounds good. Keep me posted.
Thanks
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: lucky2go <noreply-uk@lucky2go.com>reply-to: noreply-uk@lucky2go.comdate: Oct 3, 2023, 10:04 PMsubject: Your electronic ticketmailed-by: transactional.emaillabs.net.plsigned-by: lucky2go.comsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
lucky2go booking number7099713782View detailsThis message was generated automatically, please do not respond to it.
Your electronic ticketThank you for using our services. This e-mail is your electronic ticket.
lucky2go booking numberNeeded when contacting lucky2go 7099713782
You can check the current information regarding your booking here.
Additionally, we may send you emails with important information related to this booking, including online check-in and any schedule changes.
Purchased services:
Flight booking number
Los Angeles - Fort Lauderdale
CP5HUA
Price detailsTotal price: 57.44 USD
LuggageMr Michael TaylorLos Angeles → Fort LauderdalePersonal item 45 × 35 × 20 cmNo hand baggageNo checked baggage
Flight details (all hours are in local time)PassengersMr Michael TaylorDate of birth: 01.01.1990
Ticket number: CP5HUA
Los Angeles → Fort LauderdaleDeparture:20:56, 14 Oct 2023 (Sat)
Los Angeles, Los Angeles Intl Airport, United States of America, (LAX)
Arrival:05:01, 15 Oct 2023 (Sun)
Fort Lauderdale, Fort Lauderdale–Hollywood Intl Airport, United States of America, (FLL)Airline: Spirit AirlinesFlight no.: 310Operated by: NKClass: EconomyDuration: 5 h 05 min
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: lucky2go <noreply-uk@lucky2go.com>reply-to: noreply-uk@lucky2go.comdate: Oct 3, 2023, 10:37 PMsubject: Your electronic ticketmailed-by: transactional.emaillabs.net.plsigned-by: lucky2go.comsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
lucky2go booking number7099713782View detailsPassengersMr Michael TaylorDate of birth: 19.01.1990
Ticket number: CP5HUA
Los Angeles → Fort LauderdaleDeparture:20:56, 14 Oct 2023 (Sat)
Los Angeles, Los Angeles Intl Airport, United States of America, (LAX)
Arrival:05:01, 15 Oct 2023 (Sun)
Fort Lauderdale, Fort Lauderdale–Hollywood Intl Airport, United States of America, (FLL)
Airline: Spirit AirlinesFlight no.: 310Operated by: NKClass: EconomyDuration: 5 h 05 min
It may happen that we will ask you for confirmation of your data and additional documents. Do not worry! It is standard procedure connected with our fraud protection policy.
If you have any questions or concerns, please check out the most frequently asked questions. You can also check the details on the page of your booking. If you need to contact us, please use the contact form.Helpline: +44 752 066 0809 - open 24/7.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONThe Flight Ticket Reservation System Administrator is lucky2go Sp. z o.o., ul.Mickiewicza 29, 40-085 Katowice, Poland.Terms and conditions, information on personal data processing and other legal information, available at lucky2go.com
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Oct 5, 2023, 9:20 AMmailed-by: gmail.com
What is next for me?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,date: Oct 5, 2023, 10:50 AMmailed-by: gmail.com
I understand it may not be in your best interest to argue with the judge. But, if you're not going to argue with the judge in terms of these charges being discriminative in nature then I am not receiving a competent defense because there is an obvious conflict of interest between you and the judge. Necessary arguments have not been made throughout this entire process and I just don't have months upon months to be strung along! This case happened when I was 31 and I'm about to turn 34.
The speculation against me is only valid IF tha other parties are charged. Otherwise, it undermines my so-called constitutional rights and I have protections for tha simple fact that video shows I was victimized. If my attackers are not charged, then it doesn't even matter whether I committed a crime or not! The crime(s) committed against me is already a fact in tha case! And I already have rights that protect me against racial discrimination which is tha only justification they have.
A person can't violently attack another person over a traffic accident nor can a person compel another person to commit a crime against his will.
I will not tolerate blatant discrimination to my face from any court. The court will answer to this claim before they proceed against me.
I'd like a response please.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,date: Oct 5, 2023, 11:59 AMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
The internet testifies against you in what your responsibilities are as public defenders.
If a defendant can establish a prima facie case of discriminatory charging, the burden may shift to the prosecution to provide a non-discriminatory justification for their actions. Courts will then assess the legitimacy of those justifications.
Overall, the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause applies to how a defendant is charged, and allegations of discriminatory charging can be examined in the legal process. The interpretation and application of these principles may evolve through court decisions and legal precedents.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Oct 5, 2023, 12:29 PMsubject: RE: Re:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
Thank you for your email. I’m so sorry that Tuesday’s hearing has caused you such distress. I know how difficult this case has been for you. I’m sorry that you are going through this. However, we have had several productive discussions regarding mental health diversion and that is a goal that we are actively working towards. Dr. D’Ingillo will be making contact with you to evaluate you for eligibility pursuant to Penal Code Section 1001.36. We will work on a treatment plan that will be helpful for you in three ways: the dismissal of your case, mental health treatment and the avoidance of any jail time. We are working towards resolution. I don’t want you to lose sight of that.
Of course, if this is no longer the path you wish to pursue, I understand that as well. We can work towards jury trial. The arguments that you bring up are well-taken and could be appropriate arguments to make at trial or in a pre-trial motion to dismiss. We have discussed over the last few months, at length, how that could potentially play out.
I believe the language you are quoting regarding a “prima facie case of discriminatory charging” is language quoted directly from the Racial Justice Act Statute. I did consult with our office’s Racial Justice Act team who determined that, under these very specific circumstances, an RJA motion would not be appropriate. However, that does not preclude you from filing an alternative motion.
What I am getting at is that there are options for you. I was under the impression after our last discussion in my office conference room and in court on Tuesday that you intended to pursue mental health diversion and so that is where I put my focus.
I encourage you to consider all of your options and let me know how you wish to proceed.
Thank you,Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Oct 5, 2023, 12:53 PMsubject: RE:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
Ms. Bell advised me that your next court date is January 24, 2024. She expects to have the doctor’s report by then and to have filed the motion for mental health diversion. She remains hopeful that the judge will grant it on the next court date.
She and I join in your frustration that the judge denied the request to allow you to drive. We disagree with decision but it is not uncommon for attorneys to disagree with a ruling by the judge. We must, however, abide by it. If mental health diversion is granted, your permission to drive will be restored.
Casey Lilienfeld (He/Him)Head DeputyPasadena Branch & Area OfficesLos Angeles County Public Defender300 E. Walnut Street, Suite 311Pasadena, California 91101(626) 356-5484
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Oct 5, 2023, 1:09 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
If mental health diversion is granted, my permission to drive will be restored? How definitive is that exactly? Because I can work with that.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Oct 5, 2023, 1:14 PMsubject: RE: Re:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
That would typically be the case when mental health diversion is granted. Ms. Bell will ensure that is the case before agreeing to mental health diversion. If the judge says your permission to drive will not be restored (which we don’t believe will happen), you can refuse to accept mental health diversion and demand a jury trial.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Oct 5, 2023, 1:18 PMsubject: Re: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
Ok but a jury trial under these circumstances are unjust and should be argued and challenged accordingly. But, I will accept this answer for now.
Listen, I'm not proud of my performance at court the other day and I feel your frustration because I sincerely believe you are working hard to help me. Yours and Ms. Bell's facial expressions demonstrated that and I don't hold you at fault.
Can we schedule a time next week to come in and talk please? Perhaps this meeting can be about specifically about how we can work together as a team considering my emotional and psychological weaknesses. I didn't mean to embarrass you or Ms. Bell. But these charges feel personal and I need your help.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Oct 5, 2023, 1:32 PMsubject: RE: Re:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I very much appreciate your comments. I’m really happy to hear that you see that we are working solely to help you. Actually, it is Ms. Bell who is doing all the work. I can tell you, without any reservation, she cares deeply about obtaining the best possible outcome for you and is motivated solely by that goal. I can objectively say that you are very lucky to have her as your lawyer.
I will make time next week to be available to talk to you, with Ms. Bell, assuming she is available also. We will await to hear from her regarding her availability.
I am aware that you have been through a lot; more than anyone should have to endure. You are obviously very intelligent. But even intelligent people have weaknesses. Recognizing our own weaknesses is actually one of the greatest strengths we can have in life. I commend you for that.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Oct 5, 2023, 1:45 PMsubject: RE: Re:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
Thank you for your words. I am never embarrassed by you. I only want to help as best I can. I am available next week so please let us know when you are free and we can schedule a meeting.
Take care,Danielle Daroca Bell
On Mon, Aug 3, 2026, 8:59 AM Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com> wrote:
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 24, 2023, 8:33 AMsubject: Apologymailed-by: gmail.com
Good morning, Ms. Bell.
I understand that I've been difficult to deal with and speak to. I have come to realize that this behavior is not helping me or my lawyer work as a team. Therefore, I apologize for using profanity, vulgarity, and insults towards you. Just because I might strongly disagree with you doesn't mean you deserve to be disrespected. I was wrong. And I sincerely apologize for my conduct towards you. I will see to it that this doesn't happen again. My change of heart comes after realizing these are the opportunities to identify my triggers and to apply what I have learned in mental health treatment to prevent levels of anger from escalating. I don't want my behavior towards you to stop me from effectively participating in my own defense. So again, I sincerely apologize for my language and attitude towards you and I am going to do everything in my power to learn from this and make the necessary adjustments so this doesn't happen again.
How soon do you think I can get the full discovery uploaded to the Box folder? I have received the notice that you accepted the invitation.
Also, can you please send me copies of your failed motion to dismiss please and kindly inform me on what grounds you made the motion for? I would greatly appreciate that.
I would also like to request all transcribed correspondences between alleged victims, complaining witness, and the prosecutor along with the interrogation video.
Your diligence in this matter is crucial for my defense. I appreciate your understanding in this regard.
I look forward to your timely response.
Thank you
Michael Taylor
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 24, 2023, 10:26 AMsubject: RE: Apologymailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
Thank you for your email.
I did not circumvent or compromise any of your constitutional rights, due process rights or equal protection rights by raising a motion to dismiss to the court yesterday. The motion is not dispositive. I am not precluded from raising it again at any other time that I see fit. As promised in our discussion on Tuesday, I am researching potential motions to dismiss to file with the court in the future. This was an oral motion, it was not written. The court denied it without prejudice, meaning, I can ask her to hear it again. I merely raised it so that the court and opposing counsel would know, since I was not the attorney of record at the preliminary hearing nor at the 995 hearing, that I believe a motion to dismiss is warranted.
As far as getting you the discovery, I will do that as quickly as I can. I will work diligently to get it to you, but I cannot promise when it will be completed.
Sincerely,Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 24, 2023, 10:32 AMsubject: Re: Apologymailed-by: gmail.com
Ok, thank you for the clarity on this matter. Going forward I will make it a priority to communicate effectively and remember to exclude my emotions. And please feel free to call me on this anytime.
Please get the discovery as soon as you can. I will let you know my travel arrangements when they are finalized.
Thank you for your continued patience with me. I promise I will turn this around, my behavior and attitude that is.
Have a good weekend.
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 28, 2023, 2:59 PMsubject: RE: Please Don't Waste Timemailed-by: gmail.com
So, because you have a predetermined interest in my case means I have to be stalled out on having the necessary information to participate in my own defense?
With all due respect to your caseload, your caseload has absolutely nothing to do with me. Please help me to be prepared in my defense.
If you are unwilling to make a motion to dismiss for selective prosecution, then you might need to discuss with your supervisor about possibly getting me a state appointed attorney. Because, I'm going to tell you right now, I won't be tolerating any further delays in my reasonable requests concerning my defense.
If you think you don't need to take orders from me, then why should you remain my lawyer? Why should you remain my lawyer if you're just going to gaslight me on every issue.
I get the impression that you plan to make whatever decision you want to, and not ones that are in MY best interest. I sincerely have reason to believe this is the case. And as far as trusting you, you are on razor thin ice. There's no reason I was supposed to be dragged thru tha mud this long. This is an obvious case of selective prosecution. So, how smart could you really be to not see that and make tha case yourself?
I want a response please.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 28, 2023, 3:27 PMsubject: RE: Please Don't Waste Timemailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I received your request regarding the discovery related to your case. I advised you last week that I would work diligently to get that to you as soon as I can and that is what I am doing.
Thank you,Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 28, 2023, 3:36 PMsubject: Re: Please Don't Waste Timemailed-by: gmail.com
Ok, thank you, Ms. Bell.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 28, 2023, 4:06 PMsubject: Re: Please Don't Waste Timemailed-by: gmail.com
I understand that with a public defender, a defendant's input can be considered but the lawyer makes the ultimate decision even if it is contrary to his wishes.
Those are odds I cannot afford to take. I will have to represent myself, Ms. Bell. I don't have time to sabotage any further opportunities to challenge tha charges against me.
With all due respect to your education as a lawyer, that's still not enough to earn yourself tha trust of your client. Implicit bias can absolutely be tha case. Before being a lawyer, you are a human as I am. Therefore, you're just as fallible as any person. Although unethical, you could absolutely pose a conflict of interest in my case. These things are possible. If I can't speak to help myself and I was a law abiding citizen when this incident happened, then why should you be given tha benefit of tha doubt if I'm not afforded it?
You guys hide behind a supervisor and everything you do for a defendant's case is too damn secret for me! Who's to say you guys don't have smart ass conversations about defendants off tha record? I think you're all biased because after all, it's Los Angeles. There's too many people there as it is. And there you are, working for a system where you could never impact change on a considerable level.
My gut just tells me that all of you in the public defenders office, at least for the Pasadena region, are inherently untrustworthy. I have strong reason to believe that you guys have developed a strategy that helps prosecutors secure convictions on some level to cover up your potential biases and mistakes. I think you guys would rather a defendant wrongfullt go to prison than to be embarrassed for being incompetent. Tell me I'm wrong and who knows, I MIGHT believe you.
The police report needs to be called into question. When tha police refuse to admit and acknowledge that a defendant was even attacked at all during interrogation. When 2 Armenians attack a black man in a city that is 35-40% Armenian. When prosecutors are relying on speculation against a defendant. When the court participates in the defendant's car being sold without proper notice. When the defendant can't use the car as evidence to support his defense because there are no photos of the passenger side exterior of the car. When all of the lawyers I've had persistently refuse to preserve my rights on the record amidst a potential equal protection violation. When the defendant's attackers behavior cannot be properly justified yet remain uncharged.
You are violating rights I already have! Go ahead and tell me as a citizen of The United States that I have to "earn" my constitutional rights. You can't just say you're not violating my rights as you're violating my rights. And I feel tha more I talk with you, tha more you help tha prosecutor build a rebuttal. Because truth is, you along with tha prosecutor and city of Glendale think you're doing tha world a justice by solely blaming a black man for being attacked while having no reasonable recourse. You are biased for tha simple fact that these charges undermine the goodwill of a peaceful citizen.
When I was homeless, I've spent years of mu entire day at the Pasadena Central Library. I wasn't hanging out in the parks around criminals and drug addicts. I was building websites. I was interviewing local artists about their career, goals, and experiences. Why would you allow me to suffer just because I had a right to pursue and obtain safety? Why would you refuse to argue how these rights could even just be perceived as racially discriminative?
If you and I were trapped in a hole, perhaps our interests would align on getting out of the hole. But, as it stands, you and your office do not share my best interests. And I don't think you guys have been zealous enough in your efforts to raise legal precedence during tha appropriate stage of proceedings.
All you know is what you won't do. You won't volunteer and tell me which case law to research. You're not going to give me direction on how I can best help myself. You're going to insist that I blindly trust you even tho it's painfully obvious that you're railroading me.
I want a state appointed attorney please. I am prepared to represent myself if necessary. I don't need your warnings on taking such action. For your lack of a reasonable and competent defense has manifested into a disparate impact leading me to have even more liability to tha government by being unable to process my taxes and establish payroll for my employees. I've made close to $9k this month and I've had to pay out 87% of it because this case is preventing me from running my own business AND keeping a job! Nothing about this case is righteous. You can't solely hold me accountable just because you'd rather see a black man charged than 2 Armenians who exhibited malicious intent to violate law & order. If you already know tha behavior of my attackers can't be properly justified, why are you still playing into the prosecutor's theory!?
If any felonious charges against the Yaghoubovs are not pursued, it is a violation of application of law against a defendant and absolutely a selective prosecution. Because a prosecutor's discretion doesn't give them authority to infringe upon the defendant's rights.
State appointed attorney please. Thank you.
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 29, 2023, 4:12 PMsubject: RE: Explanationmailed-by: gmail.com
I'm going to need an explanation from your office about how this isn't an obvious case of discriminative bias.
How are we 2 years into a case and still in pretrial and no one from the public defenders office has even hinted at tha possibility of a potential uneven application of law?
This is obvious discrimination! And if you say it isn't discrimination then that is a direct conflict of interest as suggested by admissible evidence.
Why would you presume that these charges aren't discriminative if my attackers are caught on video violating my rights AND law & order?
But u would rather me go to trial to answer to elements of charges that ignores the uneven application of laws because you are posing a conflict of interest in my case. Why is that? Because you know that if the alleged victims faced trial or even probable cause, chances are high they would be convicted!!!
You guys are not trustworthy. That's why I can't believe anything you say. All the heinous crimes you deal with all day everyday and you can't look at my case and say hey, why are 2 Armenians attacking this man and they're not charged either?
The only reason this case is a messed up situation is because you and the prosecutor and the Glendale Police Department already know you're not going to defend your client's constitutional rights. You already know you're not going to do that.
Get me that video before going home for tha day please. I don't appreciate my requests being overlooked and ignored thank you.
That's all you guys have done is everything in your power to prejudice my defense.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 29, 2023, 4:47 PMsubject: Re: Explanationmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor-
I’m not sure what requests you feel I’ve ignored. I responded to you yesterday that I would diligently work on your request and that is what I am doing. Your case is important to me. I am doing everything I said I would do to represent you to the fullest extent of the law, whether you choose to believe me or not.
I am working on your request as quickly as I can, but I will not be able to send you the video today. As promised, I will send it to you as quickly as I can.
Danielle Daroca Bell
Get Outlook for iOS
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 29, 2023, 4:49 PMsubject: Re: Explanationmailed-by: gmail.com
Ok, I'm sorry for the added pressure
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 1, 2023, 8:25 AMmailed-by: gmail.com
You're not lagging because you're busy. You're lagging because you don't care how I feel and you have predetermined decisions you already know you're going to make against my wishes.
I wish you guys would just take yourselves off my case already! You fail me miserably.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 1, 2023, 12:45 PMsubject: RE:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
I’m sorry you feel that way, Mr. Taylor. Nothing could be further from the truth, with regards to my schedule and caseload or how much I care about your case. Despite your feelings about me or my commitment to you as my client, I will continue to work on your case to the best of my ability.
Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,date: Sep 1, 2023, 12:53 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
Ok, well since we're tagging Casey in this email, here is what I need explained to me:
Why wasn't racial bias concerning these charges brought up at the beginning of this case? If charges are not pursued against my attackers, then this equates to a presumption of guilt because their actions cannot be properly justified without implying my guilt.
What are you guys hiding exactly?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 1, 2023, 12:56 PMsubject: RE: Re:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
All I can say is what I am doing now is exploring a Racial justice Act claim. I have never hidden anything from you.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 1, 2023, 1:04 PMsubject: Re: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
That's not going to work and you know it. We are not going to exercise any "racial justice" act. It's absolutely unnecessary if tha charges are already fraudulent.
You talking about racial justice act is just another strategy to sabotage my defensible options. We don't need to invoke a political act if tha charges are already illegal.
I have a better strategy than you.
We will have tha prosecutor clarify tha charges on tha record.
We will use their own language to challenge tha legality of tha charges.
The racial justice act is just another way of saying "we don't think tha prosecutor is wrong in tha charges against Michael Taylor"
I can't understand how me insisting on rights I already have is too much to ask from you people.
Even amidst speculative evidence, you only propose weak defenses. Why, because you and tha prosecutor share tha same offices. There is an obvious conflict of interest and I'm sick and fucking tired of tha bad people in this country ruining shit for everyone else.
Obey tha law! My constitutional rights can't be given nor taken away.
We will not be utilizing any racial justice act. We will challenge tha charges outright.
And this conflict of interest with you and tha prosecutor is really pissing me tf off! They're wrong. And I don't give a fuck if you believe me or not.
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 4, 2023, 3:31 PMsubject: Failed Contact #2mailed-by: gmail.com
Your office is doing Glendale PD a favor to make sure I get convicted for something I shouldn't be responsible for.
Even if "equal protection" doesn't work, why are none of you guys from the public defenders office challenging the legality of charges or raising concerns about potential discrimination in the charged?
I was attacked for crying out loud. If it's about me being held responsible, the alleged victims can file a lawsuit. But there's no way I should have criminal charges exclusively when we have video evidence of me being attacked without it being discrimination because there is no other justification for their malicious criminal behavior.
And you are denying me justice and the right to a fair trial by standing in my way of a proper defense. How is it not ineffective assistance of counsel when you've been nothing but ineffective? You can't even convince one person to believe you and I'm just supposed to blindly trust you?!
A true Christian could never do this to someone. It's tha catholic type that don't lose sleep at night for denying people justice. Thinking you can just do all this dirt and confess it later. Forgiveness doesn't work like that. Repentance has to be sincere.
Your office would rather go thru tha trouble of hiring expensive doctors on tha tax payers dime to come and explain why something is wrong with me!? I'm not tha one who responded with violence to a fender bender! You keep making lame arguments that give credence to tha prosecutor's case and you slip it in there real slick to make it seem like you're doing your job but in reality you are outright refusing to preserve my rights on the record.
How could you be so afraid to challenge the legality of charges with proof they attacked me and tha prosecutor's reliance on speculation?
Whh would Christian not raise tha issue of potential bias in tha charges and instead talk about a 3rd party in tha Toyota Sequoia who had absolutely nothing to do with me!? All that argument did was compound tha question of my guilt instead of raising issues that speak to tha true nature of this case.
A man punched my window out as I was trying to park my car. Why should any civilian have to be met with such evil? And to hold me solely accountable for having no recourse in such a situation is outright irresponsible! And that means you are bad people. Prejudice people. Why should I be held accountable for another person's reckless negligence?
How could you play a part in robbing me of my future? Why does tha prosecutor need to speculate against me as if these 2 men have a right to break tha law? By allowing these charges to go to trial, you are basically saying
-Armenians can commit crime, but blacks or others cannot.-It's lawful to respond with violence to traffic infractions-Public order and safety is not a common government interest
The prosecutor is only willing to go to trial under tha condition that I answer alone to matters that speak nothing to tha fact that me, a peaceful citizen, was maliciously attacked.
And now, you're delaying me receiving my discovery so that I can properly defend myself. Let me tell you something. I serve my community like it's Armageddon. If I were my client who made this request I would see to it that he got what he asked for. But, seeing how you go home weekends at a time while I'm losing sleep and having anxiety attacks obviously means nothing to you.
Why would you work for an office that would have you cross helpless people? This is what you signed up for so how innocent of a person could you really be? I didn't sign up to be a lawyer, you did! And you can't even do that right.
I want the interrogation video and the full on police reports uploaded to the shared box folder before the end of day Tuesday. I don't think it's right that I am delayed any further by your negligence.
My best interest is my personal interest. And whatever you have planned or predetermined on my behalf does not trump my own personal interests. I don't care who has what to say about that.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 5, 2023, 12:35 PMsubject: RE: Failed Contact #2mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Good morning, Mr. Taylor,
As previously promised, please find a link to the video of your interrogation below. Unfortunately, I was unable to upload it to your box account because the file is too large. Please let me know if you have any issues opening it. I am still working on the redaction of the police reports, but hope to have it to you soon.
I thought I made myself abundantly clear, but it is evident by your emails from last week that you were unclear about my position. I will not respond to emails wherein you are using profanity, insulting me, or calling me names, etc. I will not tolerate it. If you expect a professional response to your inquires and questions, then you will need to send them in a respectful manner.
Sincerely,
Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 5, 2023, 1:04 PMsubject: Re: Failed Contact #2mailed-by: gmail.com
You are going to defend my constitutional rights on tha record if you want my respect. Otherwise, you're just a hostile official in my way. Perhaps start acting like a lawyer for a change.
Derailing my entire life and gaslighting me on rights I already have is disrespectful to me. Because I wake up everyday able ready and willing to make a difference when it counts. The people who know me tha most will tell you that I do not play games with people. This is a serious matter so excuse me if I don't give a fuck about your little bitch ass feelings.
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 6, 2023, 1:01 PMsubject: RE: Police Reportmailed-by: gmail.com
Good afternoon, Ms. Bell.
With all due respect, it took you two weeks to send me a link to a file that was uploaded over a year ago. I believe the police report may also be in a link as well.
Please advise. Thank you.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Sep 6, 2023, 1:58 PMsubject: Re: Police Reportmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
The police report is being redacted. I should have it to you by Friday.
Get Outlook for iOS
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 7, 2023, 1:51 PMsubject: RE: Police Reportmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
Please find the requested police report attached.
Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 7, 2023, 1:57 PMsubject: Re: Police Reportmailed-by: gmail.com
Thank you.
Is there any assistance available in helping me get back to Los Angeles. I am struggling to make enough money for a ticket.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Sep 7, 2023, 2:12 PMsubject: RE: Police Reportmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Let me see if there are any resources available through our Partners for Justice Program. I will let you know.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 7, 2023, 4:43 PMsubject: Re: Police Reportmailed-by: gmail.com
Ok, thank you. I'll let you know if I'm able to get a ticket before I hear back from you.
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 12, 2023, 8:50 AMsubject: RE: Clarificationmailed-by: gmail.com
Also, I would like a formal explanation as to why it took you two weeks to send me a link to video that was uploaded last year. I'm sure there is a valid reason I'm just trying to assess if this delay was deliberate or not. I'd like to form my own conclusion please.
Thanks
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 12, 2023, 9:06 AMsubject: RE: Clarificationmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
No. It was not deliberate. I have many cases. I am working as quickly as I can. You have said many times in your previous emails that my other cases do not matter, however, those clients deserve my time and energy as well. You are free to make whatever conclusions you like. I continue, despite whatever it is you believe, to work diligently on your case and in your defense.
Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Sep 12, 2023, 9:14 AMsubject: Re: Clarificationmailed-by: gmail.com
One doesn't "make" conclusions. We "come" to conclusions.
Thank you
On Sun, Aug 2, 2026, 11:44 PM Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com> wrote:
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 21, 2023, 5:11 PMsubject: Failed Contact #1mailed-by: gmail.com
Just so we're clear, we are not ready to set a trial date. Do not set a trial date on August 23rd. I would like to be present in court if that happens. On Wednesday August 23rd, we will put it over approximately 2 weeks so that I can travel back from Seattle, Washington and address my concerns in person.
This is also a friendly reminder for you to call me before end of day Tuesday. It makes no sense for you to stand in for me without speaking with me the week of.
I strongly believe you guys are working hard to prejudice me and manipulate me behind the judge's back. But, tha judge will be told about your negligent defense if I am not contacted prior to my court date. I have the phone number to the courtroom clerk and will be checking in with them first thing Wednesday morning.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Aug 21, 2023, 5:31 PMsubject: RE: Failed Contact #1mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I have received your emails. I appreciate how difficult this experience has been for you and, although I know you are skeptical, I want to assure you that I only have your best interest at heart.
I understand that equal protection under the law is the argument you wish to make to the court. While I stand by my assessment that that is not the appropriate legal argument in this case, I do recognize that there is a racial component to the prosecution of this case that I believe should be explored and argued appropriately. In researching the issues that are presented in your case, I have considered recent legislation in California entitled, “The Racial Justice Act” (hereinafter RJA). I am still working on the applicability of the RJA to your case, given the specific circumstances involved. I would be happy to provide you additional information with regard to this.
I, too, would like us to be able to have an open dialogue about your case. I realize that this is a very difficult time in your life and I certainly do not want to be contributing to that. My goal is always to help my clients to the best of my ability and that is all I hope to do for you.
I understand that you will not be physically in court on Wednesday, August 23, 2023 and it is your request that I appear for you. I will agree to represent you this Wednesday, however, I do think it is important for you to come to court physically in the near future so I can meet you in person and discuss moving forward with the defense of your case. Please provide me with dates certain where you will be available to appear physically in court.
In addition, I look forward to discussing your case with you tomorrow. I am available from 3:30-4. Please let me know if this works with your schedule.
Thank you,Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 21, 2023, 6:24 PMsubject: Re: Failed Contact #1mailed-by: gmail.com
Ok. We will exercise the racial justice act AND make claims for selective prosecution. And if it can be proven then we'll throw ineffective assistance of counsel in there as well. It's not personal.
Due process has virtually been denied since your implicit bias concerning my rights have already led to a disparate impact. Why am I tha only person in this entire case pointing out tha obvious? It is imperative to note that my constitutional rights are already afforded to me. They are not something I have to earn or work for or qualify for. I already have them.
There will be no damage control for the prosecutor. We will be aggressive in our claims.
These cops and the prosecutor aren't stupid. They know they're trying to prejudice me. This is politics. These charges are a deliberate attempt to use my race, lack of profile, and post traumatic stress to prove their case I am being charged exclusively over politics. But tha prosecutor is not tha legislature so they must work within the confines of the law or the judge may dismiss tha case.
Ms. Bell, I know you know what you need to say, but if your actions don't reflect my best interests, then that can cause a potential breakdown in communication. I am keenly aware of how you guys use omissions to get what you want.
I don't need phony fact based arguments. I don't waste time arguing with foolish people. To answer to these charges would be an absolute farce. These Men ambushed me, obstructed my path to safety, and compelled me to commit what they want to call a crime. There's absolutely no way I should be charged exclusively unless there is a presumption of guilt. Under what circumstances should a prosecutor defend obvious criminals? This is a civil issue.
Can you please provide me with a video link to the interrogation video? I think Mr. Le gave me access to the box folder but I need the details again.
I will be back in Los Angeles first week of September. That's when I'll be able to afford a ticket back to LA. Please allow me enough time as I am constantly having to pay money I make to other drivers who can legally drive.
Thank you
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 23, 2023, 1:15 PMsubject: Court Todaymailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Hello Mr. Taylor,
As requested, I appeared for you today in Department F. I made two motions to the court. First, I made a motion to dismiss to the Court and asked her to dismiss the case. The Court denied the motion. Second, I asked the Court to delete the no driving term as a condition of OR on the grounds that (1) it was overbroad and not sufficiently tied to the nature of the proceedings and (2) that it was creating a financial hardship for you. The court preliminarily denied that as well, however, she did say that she would take it under submission for the next hearing date.
The Court will be dark the last two weeks of September and the calendar was full until October 3, 2023. That is the next court date. Hopefully that gives you time to be able to get yourself here to Los Angeles as well as gives me time to prepare your case. Please contact me with any questions or concerns you may have.
Thank you,
Danielle Daroca Bell she/her/hersDeputy Public Defender300 E. Walnut St., Ste 311Pasadena, CA 91101Office: (626) 356-5471Main: (626) 356-5481
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 23, 2023, 1:57 PMsubject: Re: Court Todaymailed-by: gmail.com
You stupid bitch why would you motion without me being there!?
You fucked up
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 23, 2023, 2:12 PMsubject: Re: Court Todaymailed-by: gmail.com
That was a deliberate sabotage of my defense! I am coming back to Los Angeles immediately. I demand my full discovery.
I am going to go pro pee and raise ineffective assistance of counsel at tha very next court date!
You tried to sabotage my defense but I already have my case made!
Call me back before tha end of tha day or I will perceive that as hostility and implicit bias on your part!
You know damn well I told you to hold it over until I get there why tha fuck would you motion to dismiss without me being there!? You are posing a serious conflict of interest and you cannot be trusted under any circumstances!
You want me to be held accountable for something I shouldn't be and that is all you've been working to do! You made is big mistake on my case!
Call me back!
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 23, 2023, 2:23 PMsubject: Re: Court Todaymailed-by: gmail.com
You didn't even let me review the motion!
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 23, 2023, 3:00 PMsubject: RE: Court Todaymailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
Maybe I had not previously made myself clear. If I had not, then allow me to do absolutely clear. I will not tolerate being disrespected by you.
Any email that you send to me that includes swearing, name calling, threats or insults will not be responded to. Any phone conversation that includes swearing, name calling, threats or insults will be immediately terminated.
I will not be available to call you today. I am working on other cases this afternoon.
Sincerely,Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 23, 2023, 3:16 PMsubject: Re: Court Todaymailed-by: gmail.com
Thank you for help me build my case against you since you won't hold yourself accountable. You don't think I feel outright disgusted and disrespected and insulted by constantly being gaslighted by my own attorneys?
What were the grounds for the motion? Please copies for me before weeks end.
You just told me you understand you have to earn my trust! Why would you turn around and burn me like that!? You know that was against my best interest and personal interest.
I just can't believe you would do this. You have effectively denied me due process! Do you understand!?
This is going to be addressed at court as soon as I get back I will not be waiting all September continuing to be held hostage from running my own legitimate business.
Please email me copies of the motion you submitted. I will continue to work on improving my communication skills so as to not disrespect you again.
Thank you
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 23, 2023, 4:40 PMsubject: Re: Court Todaymailed-by: gmail.com
Just so you understand my reasoning, this is the information I've collected on the internet concerning your conduct.
"A defendant's lawyer generally does not have a right to sabotage or prematurely submit a motion to dismiss against their client's wishes. Lawyers have a duty to act in the best interests of their clients, follow their clients' instructions, and provide competent representation. This includes respecting their client's decisions about legal strategies, including whether to submit a motion to dismiss.
If a lawyer submits a motion to dismiss against their client's wishes or engages in behavior that goes against the client's best interests, it could potentially be considered a breach of the lawyer's ethical duties and professional obligations. It might also be a violation of the client's right to effective assistance of counsel.
If a defendant believes that their lawyer is acting against their wishes, it's important to communicate their concerns to the lawyer and, if necessary, seek a second opinion from another legal professional. If the situation remains unresolved, the defendant might need to consider taking appropriate legal action to protect their rights and interests."
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 23, 2023, 7:42 PMsubject: Re: Court Todaymailed-by: gmail.com
How many times did you roll your eyes at me during our conversation on the phone yesterday? Who was in the room while you had me on speaker phone?
You know what you did was biased because you absolutely overlooked my interest in having the prosecutor clarify the speculation. Did you forget that part?
You will not be representing me anymore. The public defender's office will no longer handle my case. You are irresponsible and lazy people who have bias.
Not responding to my email today is a further indicator that you are failing to address my concerns and you are hindering my in the process of participating in my own defense.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 23, 2023, 9:45 PMsubject: Re: Court Todaymailed-by: gmail.com
Your actions today further proves that you are manipulating me and trying to trigger my post traumatic stress in order to help the prosecutors case.
I cannot fucking believe this shit! I know all I need to know concerning your weak ass defenses. You are not a lawyer! You weak ass public defender's y'all ain't convinced nobody throughout this entire process.
I'm sick and tired of being discriminated against in this country man. I'm so FUCKING sick of it!
On Sun, Aug 2, 2026, 11:03 PM Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com> wrote:
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 11, 2023, 2:08 PMmailed-by: gmail.com
Why does the counsel I get from public defenders not match up with online sources? Do you understand why I have a hard time believing you?
Equal protection applies not only to civil law but also to criminal law. It ensures that individuals are treated fairly and equally by the government, whether in civil or criminal matters. This includes how defendants are charged, prosecuted, and treated within the criminal justice system. If you believe your equal protection rights are being violated in a criminal case, it's important to consult with a legal professional to assess the specific circumstances and explore your options.
Yes, you may be able to argue an equal protection violation if you can show that you are being treated differently or unfairly compared to others who are similarly situated. If the alleged victims also committed a crime but are not being charged, and you believe this treatment is based on factors like race, gender, or another protected characteristic, it could potentially raise concerns about equal protection under the law. Consulting with a legal professional who can assess the specifics of your case is advisable for a more accurate evaluation.
Equal Protection under the law generally applies to all individuals, regardless of their specific characteristics. It ensures that everyone is treated equally and fairly by the government, without discrimination based on race, gender, religion, or other protected attributes. While it is designed to prevent discrimination against specific classes of people, its application is not limited solely to those classes.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 11, 2023, 2:54 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
Ms. Bell said I haven't been denied due process. But, I have been denied due process! Equal Protection aside, due process was violated tha moment my car was released and sold without my notice.
You say this isn't an equal protection issue simply because you don't want to believe tha prosecutor filed charges discriminatively. But any time there is discrimination, do you think tha offenders are just going to admit it? Of course not!
What makes this an equal protection issue is that race is tha motivator
The mere speculation by tha prosecutor is the action that makes this discrimination. It's discrimination because evidence reveals these two Men committed a malicious crime. The prosecutor has absolutely no business defending criminals while peaceful citizens are subject to answer alone!
By you continuing to deny equal protection, you are basically helping tha prosecutor try me bc u guys believe them. And why wouldn't you believe them? You know them a lot more than you know me. You see them more than you'll ever see me.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 11, 2023, 9:56 PMsubject: Re: Does equal protection only apply to employment law?mailed-by: gmail.com
Does equal protection only apply to employment law?
No, equal protection is a constitutional principle that extends beyond employment law. It is a fundamental concept enshrined in the U.S. Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, which states that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This principle is applied across various areas of law, including but not limited to civil rights, criminal justice, education, housing, and more. It ensures that individuals are treated fairly and without discrimination by government entities and institutions.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 11, 2023, 9:58 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
Being charged exclusively for a crime even though evidence suggests you were the one attacked could potentially raise concerns about equal protection under the law. If you believe that you are being unfairly treated or discriminated against due to a bias or failure to consider evidence, it's important to consult with a legal professional to assess whether your equal protection rights may have been violated and to explore your options for addressing the situation.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 11, 2023, 9:59 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
A situation where you are being charged for a crime despite evidence suggesting you were attacked, and your lawyer insists your due process hasn't been violated, might raise concerns about equal protection. If you believe that you are not receiving equal treatment under the law based on your circumstances, it's important to thoroughly discuss your concerns with your lawyer and consider seeking a second legal opinion. Equal protection issues can be complex and context-dependent, so consulting with legal experts familiar with your specific case is advisable.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 11, 2023, 10:11 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
Im not fighting a case I've been fighting you my lawyers.
To insist I haven't been denied due process is an equal protection issue in and of itself.
How am I being treated equally under the law if I'm being charged exclusively? To charge me exclusively and to force me to answer alone is an obvious presumption of guilt.
You agree with tha prosecutor that they're not treating me unfairly because u want me to suffer just like they do!
The prosecutor can speculate all they want. But, they can't speculate against hard evidence JUST BECAUSE they want to see me in trouble instead of the assailants.
Speculation is not a common government interest. Public order and safety is a common government interest. And this incident, if anything, was a crime against public order and safety. To hold me solely accountable on speculation alone is a direct presumption of guilt.
This is fundamentally wrong! Nothing about tha charges against me make sense. And you agree they're fucked up bc what? Because you know you're working hard to sabotage my case and ruin my life. You're trying to create a criminal out of me for what? I deserve a better defense than this.
I'm going to argue to tha judge that every lawyer I have received from tha Public Defenders Office has presumed my guilt. They have presumed my guilt by gaslighting my constant requests for tha defense of my constitutional rights. I have been effectively denied zealous representation. And they have preyed upon my potential ignorance of the law and it's process.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 12, 2023, 12:16 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
I'm 100% sure you guys are helping tha prosecutor!
Why are you more concerned with working on mental health diversion to ensure I lose even If I don't get convicted? Instead of simply defending my rights, you spend hard earned tax dollars to pay for expensive doctors because you're helping tha prosecutor focus tha case away from tha attackers!!!!!!!
You people are absolutely no good and yes, you deserve to be in prison for this. Christian Le, Ms. Daroca-Bell, Mr. Cox, Ms Eby, you all deserve to go to prison for cheating me out of a fair trial.
How am I not being treated unfairly and unequally if tha people who actually committed tha crime doesn't get charged, but I do.
I outright reject this false notion that I'm just in a fucked up situation. YOU ARE THE ONED KEEPING ME IN A FUCKED UP SITUATION. ITS YOU GUYS! I don't trust Catholics. Because you guys would deceive tha world concerning Jesus Christ, so why wouldn't you deceive me into believing my rights haven't been violated. My rights were violated tha moment you refused to defend them!
Oh you guys are in for a rude awakening. You preyed upon my ignorance of tha law and have manipulated me to accept your worthless defenses! This is a fact! And on August 23rd, I'm making another case against you guys and I'm going to request tha judge summon tha jail phone recordings to prove that Christian Le presumed my guilt! I don't care anything about you denying it! It's already recorded!
We not playing games of charades. Even if you don't want to call it equal protection, you still can't use speculation to racially discriminate. And it is, in fact, discrimination because I. Am. Being. Charged. Exclusively. There is no other lawful explanation for their actions! You know this.
Out here talking about calcrimm before we even got to trial smh. Yea, u want me to face trial so that tha presumption of guilt stands. Because you know tha jury already perceives people guilty just for being involved in a criminal trial. You know that people believe officials even without evidence. So, my lawyers have been working to get me to trial so that I have a chance to go to prison instead of prosecuting actual crime!!!!!!!!!!!!
The prosecutor's speculation does not amount to any common government interest because it's discrimination.
This incident was a crime against public order and safety because tha actions of tha attackers put innocent bystanders at risk of injury. This was not heat of passion or mutual combat. And it is a common government interest to protect public order and safety. So, because this was a public order and safety issue, I shouldn't be charged at all if tha attackers are not charged! That's relevant whether you wanna call it equal protection or not!
Equal protection is part of due process and it exists to ensure government bodies do not treat groups differently. It applies to all people.
What kind of person do you have to be to represent a client YOU ALREADY KNOW IS BEING CHEATED ON!? And instead of giving him tha zealous representation he rightfully deserves, you take his defense in tha direction that gives tha prosecutor credence?
If tha prosecutor wants to put people in jail, they have to follow tha rules. And regardless of what you racist and prejudice people say or think, I am protected by these rules. You can't charge me out of tha penal code when tha penal code already justifies my actions. But, u wanna talk calcrimm to me like I'm some random dumbass smh
Yall fucked up. You made a grave mistake! And I will make sure you know it! All of my actions in life are in good faith! And you faggots barked up tha wrong fucking tree homie.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 13, 2023, 5:50 AMsubject: Public defenders have a legal and ethical duty to protect their client's constitutional rights.mailed-by: gmail.com
Public defenders have a legal and ethical duty to protect their client's constitutional rights. This includes rights such as the right to a fair trial, the right to remain silent, the right to legal representation, and other fundamental rights outlined in the Constitution. Public defenders are tasked with providing competent and zealous representation for individuals who cannot afford private legal counsel. Their role is to ensure that their clients' rights are upheld throughout the legal process.
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 17, 2023, 11:07 AMmailed-by: gmail.com
How could you insist my rights haven't been violated when the behavior of the alleged victims would meet the standards for probable cause as well?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 18, 2023, 1:06 PMsubject: RE:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I apologize for the late reply, but it took me a while to read through the emails you sent while I was out of the office on a personal matter. I have had the chance to review the emails you sent. I want to assure you that I have only your best interest at heart with regard to this case and I intend, as I do with all of my clients, to fight for you to the fullest extent of the law. Although you may disagree, I have reviewed your file extensively and I agree with Mr. Le’s assessment of your case. I believe that he was right in advising you that equal protection was not a viable argument in your defense.
As I explained to you in my email last week, in my opinion, you have a strong case and the DA has significant weaknesses on their side. You also have the option of pursuing diversion on your case if you should so choose.
Will you be coming to court in person on 8/23/23? Please let me know.
Thank you,Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 18, 2023, 1:26 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
I find it suspicious that I have more questions than you guys have for me considering I was there and you weren't.
What makes you so sure I'm not being prejudiced? This is perverted justice.
On August 23rd, I won't be able to make it to court physically.
But, we are going to ask the court to request that the prosecutor clarify how these speculative charges are consistent with a common government interest of protecting public order and safety. I have a letter already drafted. Will send to you later today.
Whether there is an argument for equal protection or not, it makes perfect sense to preserve my rights on tha record amidst speculative evidence.
You guys are jokers bro I FUCKING hate your guts for being biased towards me.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 18, 2023, 1:27 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
I take this shit personal
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 18, 2023, 1:35 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
Christian Le is a weasel I don't trust nothing he says and if u agree w him then we have a conflict of interest. I got words for y'all and when I finally make it to court its gonna be a day at work for your entire office.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 18, 2023, 1:41 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
Every time u insist equal protection doesn't apply, I take it as a threat of hostility.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2026, 10:56 PM Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com> wrote:
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Jun 12, 2023, 12:08 PMsubject: RE: Michael Taylormailed-by: gmail.com
Good afternoon, Ms. Bell
Michael Taylor here. Just following up with you after getting your email from Linda. Can you please give me a call at your best convenience?
Thanks
Michael Taylor213.561.0554
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Jun 13, 2023, 1:41 PMsubject: RE: Michael Taylormailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Hi Mr. Taylor-
So nice to hear from you. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. Thank you so much for reaching out. I’m working to get up to speed on the cases I received as quickly as I can. My goal is to call you by the end of the week to discuss your case. I’m hoping to call you sometime Thursday afternoon. Please let me know if that works for you.
Thank you,Danielle
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Linda Eby <LEby@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Jul 30, 2023, 10:18 PMmailed-by: gmail.com
Ok now I might not be important to tha world in your view. But I really don't think my position concerning so-called equal protection is far fetched.
I mean, what this prosecutor's office is doing to me is almost no different than what tha federal government is doing with Trump in contrast to Biden. Weaponizing institutions against people it doesn't like!
And for what!? The case should be thrown out for tha simple fact that there is no lawful justification for responding with violence to a traffic infraction.
If there is no excuse to not know tha law, why is this being overlooked?
Why are every single one of my viable legal defenses overlooked and downplayed like tha book doesn't fucking say it!? I didn't write or prescribe tha penal code. Why should I respect your profession if your whole strategy is just a game of charades?
You guys make arrogant assumptions all day long because you deal with defendants who think they know better than you. But when you get a defendant who makes a sound legal argument, you wanna act like I can't figure this out on my own.
Why does any state prosecutor have so-called powers to prosecute pure speculation over hard evidence? Why does a prosecutor have discretion to break tha very law we are all held to, in order to criminalize peaceful citizens!?
There is no case here. They have all just been wasting my fucking time!
Because if you think you can break tha law to enforce it against me, that is perceived hostility. I am a citizen of tha United States. I wasn't even a California resident when this incident took place. And this gross violation of my civil rights is producing heinous circumstances for me alone.
I hate this fucking country because of people like you. Because you betray my trust! Because everyday I wake up to do tha right thing and you fucking insult me by tha idea of creating a criminal out of me. Ya fucking bitches!
Drop this fucking case!
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Linda Eby <LEby@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Jul 30, 2023, 10:22 PMsubject: Re: Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.mailed-by: gmail.com
Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.
Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.
Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.
Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.Racial discrimination is tha only justification they have. That's what makes this a viable equal protection issue. And yes, equal protection applies to how defendants are charged.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Linda Eby <LEby@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 1, 2023, 9:35 AMsubject: RE: Re:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
When we emailed last week, I advised you that I had reached out to the DA about meeting with him regarding your case. I’m very sorry that this case causes you so much distress and I want to see a fair resolution for you. Linda and I will call you tomorrow afternoon so we can discuss your issues with this case.
Again, Mr. Taylor, I am working on your behalf to resolve your case. I don’t appreciate your language. I look forward to speaking with you tomorrow.
Danielle Daroca Bell
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 10, 2023, 7:36 PMsubject: Meeting Todaymailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Hello Mr. Taylor,
As promised, I did meet with the assigned Deputy District Attorney today regarding your case. I laid out all of the strengths of your case and pointed put the weaknesses in theirs. He agreed that their case has some issues in terms of proving the charge, however, he has ultimately decided that he will not be dismissing the case.
I think that Mental Health Diversion is an option for resolution. Mental Health Diversion is a 2 year program which would require you to participate in some type of mental health services for a 2 year period. Once the two year period is up, as long as you are in compliance with treatment and have obeyed all laws, the court will dismiss your case. Mental health diversion does not involve a guilty or no contest plea and you would maintain your not guilty plea for the duration of the diversionary period. Mental health diversion requires that I file a motion with the court and the court would have to grant the motion to allow you to participate in treatment, but I do believe it’s a viable option in your case if you’d like to pursue it.
Finally, if you are not interested in a resolution of your case by way of mental health diversion or some other plea agreement, then we would set the case for jury trial. I would be representing you at the jury trial where 12 people from the community would serve as jurors, listen to the evidence in the case and decide whether you are guilty or not guilty. I believe you have a viable defense to these charges and would be prepared to argue as such to the jury. If you are found guilty after trial, the court would sentence you.
I look forward to hearing from you with regard to the above and hope we can discuss your options. Your next court date is 8/23/23.
Sincerely,
Danielle Daroca Bell she/her/hersDeputy Public Defender300 E. Walnut St., Ste 311Pasadena, CA 91101Office: (626) 356-5471Main: (626) 356-5481
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 10, 2023, 8:04 PMsubject: Re: Meeting Todaymailed-by: gmail.com
We will argue equal protection on August 23rd.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 10, 2023, 8:10 AMsubject: Full Briefmailed-by: gmail.com
I ain't taking backseat to anybody today. I want a full briefing before 4p.
Thank you for understanding.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Linda Eby <LEby@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 10, 2023, 8:48 AMsubject: RE: Full Briefmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I will give you a full briefing of my meeting with Mr. Park as soon as I am able. That might be tomorrow. I realize this is upsetting to you, but before 4 is not possible for me. I have back to back meetings this afternoon. As soon as my schedule permits, I will discuss this with you. Thank you for understanding.
Danielle
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 10, 2023, 8:53 AMsubject: Re: Full Briefmailed-by: gmail.com
Or you can record it on voice record and send me a copy. I don't have time for any of this! When your rights are violated it's not business as usual.
Record the meeting please thank you. I want to hear what is discussed how it's discussed and why it's discussed. I want full transparency if I am obligated to trust you.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 10, 2023, 10:57 AMsubject: Re: Full Briefmailed-by: gmail.com
If I'm expected to act cordial and professional throughout this process, how come my public defenders can't just admit to me that I'm right about my concerns for equal protection? Whether we argue it or not in court, why can't you give me credit when I'm actually right? And why would you assume I'm not insulted or offended by being gaslighted, steamrolled, and outright ignored every time I have a valid point to make?
Why does it mean so much more to you to steamroll defendants on their cases?
Either we're governed by law and order or by prejudice and emotion. You decide.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 10, 2023, 11:50 AMsubject: Re: Full Briefmailed-by: gmail.com
If a prosecutor in California refuses to respect the equal protection rights of defendants, it could potentially raise legal and ethical concerns. Defendants and their legal representatives have the right to raise such issues in court and challenge any actions or decisions that appear to violate equal protection principles. The court system should provide a mechanism for addressing such disputes and ensuring that defendants' constitutional rights are upheld. This might involve filing motions, presenting evidence, and arguing the case before the judge. Ultimately, the court's decision will depend on the specifics of the situation and the interpretation of applicable laws.
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 11, 2023, 8:29 AMmailed-by: gmail.com
Explain to me how this is not an equal protection issue please. In thorough detail.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 11, 2023, 8:39 AMsubject: Don't Make Me Wait For Answersmailed-by: gmail.com
Please explain to me how this is not an equal protection issue, since you won't argue why it is.
I think I'm correct but your supervisor won't permit you to defend my civil rights just bc you're not private lawyers. But to assert that only private lawyers defend civil rights is a red flag
Explain how and why equal protection doesn't apply to my case because right about now I think I know better than you do
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 11, 2023, 9:01 AMsubject: Re: Full Briefmailed-by: gmail.com
Please explain to me why we can't make an argument for violation of my equal protection rights?
Is Equal Protection not a part of due process?
Explain to me how equal protection isn't in both tha California and Federal Constitutions.
Explain!!!!!!!!!!!
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>,Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>cc: Casey Lilienfeld <CLilienfeld@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 11, 2023, 10:43 AMsubject: RE: Full Briefmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I know that Mr. Le explained this to you many times before. Equal Protection is not a plausible defense argument against the charges that have been brought against you. Although you see yourself (and I see you) as a victim in this incident, the District Attorney’s office does not necessarily view the evidence the same way. They believe that you intentionally ran over the complaining witness causing his injuries. I don’t believe that. I believe this was an accident and your reaction to a very frightening scenario was reasonable. In my opinion, anyone in that same situation would have been terrified at a man coming to the driver’s side door and breaking the window and would have tried to get out of the situation as quickly as possible. However, the DA is open to interpreting the evidence as they see fit and, in this case, unfortunately, they do not view it the same way as we do. That’s why you have the opportunity to fight your case, and ultimately, if you decide to do so, argue the case to the jury.
Equal protection is an argument made for a protected class of individuals. You have not been deprived of due process as this is what this court proceeding is. You have due process under the law meaning you have the ability to fight your case, have counsel, explore defenses, etc. Not only does qual protection not fit here legally, in my opinion, it is not the argument that leaves you with the best chance of prevailing against these charges.
As I explained in my email last evening, you have some options here, and I’d like to discuss them with you. I will be out of the office on a personal matter until Thursday, August 17, 2023. I look forward to speaking to you next week. Furthermore, you are always welcome to come to court on 8/23/23 if you wish.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,Danielle Daroca Bell
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 11, 2023, 11:22 AMsubject: Re: Full Briefmailed-by: gmail.com
What do you mean Equal protection is for a "protected class" exactly? That is just not how it is spelled out in tha Legislature.
So if equal protection is a protected class, then you admit I don't have protection, right?
The prosecutor can think whatever he or she wants but that doesn't mean their discretion should allow them to try defendants prejudicely. And with my car being stolen and tha court helping it happen, I don't think you guys quite understand what you're doing to me.
To be tried exclusively for me being attacked. I'm sorry but I do not agree with tha terms of California court. I do not agree nor consent because regardless of how you guys want to interpret tha law, it is causing serious emotional and psychological harm to me on a daily basis and I am now subject to have an absolute meltdown over this. This country has lost it's way.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Danielle Daroca <DBell@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 11, 2023, 1:51 PMsubject: Re: Automatic reply: Full Briefmailed-by: gmail.com
If you cant convince one person to dismiss tha charges like a good person should, how can I trust you to represent me before 12 people?
On Sun, Aug 2, 2026, 10:47 PM Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com> wrote:
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Mar 24, 2023, 9:09 AMsubject: Dismissalmailed-by: gmail.com
I cannot understand for tha life of me why you and tha court have to waste my time with this bullshit case.
As an American citizen, I have a right to equal protection of the laws. Period. Therefore, tha prosecutor has no case!
And as a public defender, that's a great defense because you are defending my constitutional rights.
Just because you don't want to take that option does not mean it isn't valid. And it shouldn't take months of court dates to try and get just one count removed. This whole case could've taken one meeting to dismiss this whole case. And now, you are working with them and against me as this entire ordeal has left me completely fucked off out here!
The DA and detectives are just mad that I didn't incriminate myself because they don't want to see a European lose to a black man. But, what kind of message is that? They cannot weaponize tha office of tha district attorney against it's own citizens and yet here you are refusing to reach out to Gascon on my behalf as if it would hurt my case.
I seen all tha countless cops named in my case. They want to see me convicted even if it's tha wrong thing to do. And you're helping them without incriminating yourself. Public defenders don't defend tha public. Instead, you help tha prosecutor NOT LOSE.
There's no way to justify public defenders not directly attacking tha prosecutor's arguments. None. And as a Man who has his own sense of justification, I care nothing about policy or what your boss told you to do. That means absolutely nothing to me. The only thing that matters right now is my so-called constitutional rights being respected and honored. What I am asking is not even too much.
The court, the county, city of Glendale, police, have all profited off my current disposition. This is an injustice. And it doesn't matter what you guys think. Only what can be proven. And it can be proven that I have civil rights and that those rights have been violated by all parties in this case... including you, Mr. Le. Yes.
The dad had tha first opportunity to contact emergency and render aid, but instead took tha law in his own hands and tried to break an entering into my vehicle while I was occupying it. I've committed no crime here! And by tha court revoking my driving privileges, they have effectively joined tha prosecutor in tha violation of my constitutional rights.
Why should my rights be violated before I can prevent it from happening?
I know one thing for 100% certain. I will not be going to prison nor will I be staying in California for any program mental health or otherwise.
If they're going to violate my rights, then they may as well renounce my citizenship in this country.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Mar 24, 2023, 10:12 AMsubject: RE: Dismissalmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
I have addressed these issues with you previously and on multiple occasions. The Judge in Dept. H also addressed these concerns that you have when you requested a hearing to have me removed as your counselor, and when you were considering going pro per. I have met the DA Head Deputy Teresa Gomez and presented things in mitigation previously and submitted all the things that your friends submitted to me. I asked her to dismiss the case. She was not willing to do that. Due to what I observed when you addressed the court and was considering going pro per I believed that your mom’s substance abuse while pregnant with you has possibly affected your brain function. If so I believe this to be possibly relevant in your defense, and is certainly mitigation. I have explained that there is a new DA assigned your case now, and that I would like to work everything up to present to him and once again ask for a dismissal. He will have to address it with his supervisor, but I feel that he is a lot more reasonable than the previous DA. I have followed up with Dr. Kowell to get me a report as soon as possible. I have tried my best to assist you.
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>cc: Noah Cox <NCox@pubdef.lacounty.gov>,Linda Eby <LEby@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: May 1, 2023, 10:36 AMsubject: RE: Failuremailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Mr. Taylor,
I’ve explained to you multiple times why I had put the matter over. There is an expert evaluation that is pending that is relevant to your defense. My supervisor has reassigned your case to an attorney from my office whose name is Noah Cox. I have ccd him to this e-mail. His phone number is 323-393-0497. You can call or text him at that number. Your next court date is 5/16/23 in Dept. F. You should be there unless you make arrangements with Mr. Cox for him to appear on your behalf without you being present.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: May 1, 2023, 10:40 AMsubject: Re: Failuremailed-by: gmail.com
This is a case involving my life. Your supervisor doesn't make such a decision without consulting me. I will be representing myself going forward.
Waiting to hear from you Monday morning just reaffirms my suspicions. I'm an entrepreneur in every sense of tha word. And if there's a deal to be made, I will broker it myself.
California will not make decisions on my behalf FOR me. I am a sovereign citizen of the United States. The state has no right to violate my rights. Period.
Thanks for wasting this much of my time.
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Linda Eby <LEby@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Jun 2, 2023, 11:57 AMsubject: new attorneymailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Danielle Daroca Bell
Kind Regards,Linda EbyParalegal
Pasadena BranchLos Angeles County Office of the Public Defender300 E Walnut Street 3rd Floor Suite 311
Pasadena, CA 91101Ph: 626-356-5473Fax: (626) 793-9799E-mail: leby@pubdef.lacounty.gov
On Sun, Aug 2, 2026, 10:36 PM Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Michael Taylor <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Aug 2, 2026, 10:23 PM
Subject: The Daroca-Bell Dossier: Exhibit #1 "Christian Le Acknowledges Right to Self Representation But Not The Right To Equal Protection" (August 18th, 2022 thru March 3rd, 2023)
To: <wb100music.epost@blogger.com>, <DistrictDefender911.epost@blogger.com>, <Districtdefender911.vernypatty@blogger.com>from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>
to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Aug 18, 2022, 9:18 AMsubject: Re: Defensemailed-by: gmail.com
To explain or even defend myself against these allegations inadvertently gives credibility to them. There needs to be an honest narrative on this case. The simple truth. I have no time for any idiot whatsoever that wants to act or believe like I cant speak to help myself. I told you what happened, if they don't "want" to believe me, then why should I respect their stance?
If we were to run thru this incident in order of events, it would, by legal definition, make me tha victim. I never committed a crime. To say I was angry is 100% complete speculation. But, we have all tha evidence necessary to prove that not only did Yaghoubov commit a crime, but acted in a way that is unlawful, put the public in danger, and his SPECIFIC ACTIONS are not protected by tha constitution. The same constitution that gives me a right to due process.
My question is this. If our state constitution says that we have a right to due process (which tha court clearly honors outright) and in tha same paragraph states that a person may not be denied equal protection of tha laws, how can they press charges on me based on assumptions when evidence clearly reveals tha man committed a malicious and intentional crime? How?
How does tha court pick and choose what they are going to honor on behalf of tha law they wrote? I'm going to represent myself because tha prosecutor will have to go thru me personally as I do not respect their stance nor do I approve of their abuse of power.
Now, it's no secret that, as a public defender, you're not going to attack tha DA's argument where it counts. I'm not going to spend all these court dates explaining so-called facts on tha record. I will state tha law on tha record in court at trial. I will be stating tha law! And if that is something you're unwilling to do then you don't have to be my lawyer.
I tell you this respectfully, with acknowledgements to your efforts and contributions to my cause. If it's unethical for me to meet with the prosecutor at a chance to liberate myself then why should I leave them to you? They cannot hide behind a public defender. In tha end, I won't have to explain my actions as evident as it seems. But, they'll have to answer for defending and justifying a repeat criminal offender before this case can be eligible for a trial. Why should I settle for testifying? I'd only be able to address questions they ask me. But, if I represent myself, I can say what needs to be said.
Fact of tha matter is, I can't trust a lawyer let alone a public defender who has any other cases against tha same prosecutors. It places severe limits on what you could actually do for me. Kinda feels like you're defending tha prosecutor's office tha way you refuse to make a legal based argument. Making fact based arguments during pretrial will only help move this along to trial. And as far as I'm concerned, this case is ineligible for trial. You can't defend a criminal and press charges on tha victim. Just because you incur injury in tha commission of a crime, doesn't make you any less liable for that crime. Calcrimm can suck it, it won't be necessary.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Aug 18, 2022, 9:29 AMsubject: RE: Defensemailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
You have definitely put a lot of thought into this decision. Representing yourself is a decision you are Constitutionally allowed to make and do. Going pro per will allow you to talk directly to the court and prosecutor. I have tried my best to explain the legal process to you.
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Christian Le <cle@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Oct 3, 2022, 1:19 PMsubject: What ifmailed-by: gmail.com
Good afternoon, Mr. Le.
Quick question. For tha sake of argument, who's to say these guys didn't plan and plot to victimize somebody in that parking lot considering his interactions with the subjects before I arrived?
I feel like these charges are racially motivated because after all, this was two Armenian Men in Glendale against a Black man so that's why everything has been unfair. Even if they want to try me, they'd have to press charges on tha other two since it can be argued that all of us put the public in danger. Otherwise, this is surely a violation of my rights and an equal protection issue.
It's not right to file charges against me just because I'm who they'd rather believe is guilty. This is not right nor is it in tha interest of justice. There's too high a risk they are penalizing tha true victim in this case. Using speculation as a means to overlook tha malicious intent of two Armenian Men in Glendale against a peaceful citizen sounds like racial discrimination to me. That's tha only reason why this whole case is "fucked up". These charges are unethical.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Oct 4, 2022, 8:55 AMsubject: RE: What ifmailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
Lets touch bases before noon today. I will give you a call when I am done w/ court.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Oct 4, 2022, 9:50 AMsubject: Re: What ifmailed-by: gmail.com
Ok. Take your time. Call me at your earliest convenience. I'll be available.
Thanks
🛑🛑🛑⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Mar 2, 2023, 12:33 PMsubject: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
Good afternoon, Mr. Le.
Can you tell me what happened in court yesterday when the judge called you and tha prosecutor to her chambers?
What's going on with this case?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Mar 2, 2023, 1:49 PMsubject: RE: Re:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
She wanted to give the DA a background of the case outside the presence of Michael’s parents. Basically said that the parents come every time, and has gotten into it with you at times so that’s why they are seated in court. She put the blame more so on them for getting into it with you. She also let the DA know that Michael Y. seemed like he had problems that day, and initiated what happened. She is encouraging us to resolve it. I asked the DA to review the file from our perspective, and dismiss the attempted murder outright.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Mar 2, 2023, 2:28 PMsubject: Re: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
And what are we doing about the hit & run charges?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Mar 2, 2023, 2:41 PMsubject: Re: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
If we want to be technical, Michael Y.'s father had the first opportunity to render aid and/or contact emergency but instead took matters into his own hands and compelled me to flee. How are we dealing with that?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Mar 3, 2023, 9:37 AMsubject: RE: Re:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
You have pled Not Guilty to those charges. We will be going to trial on those charges. I am trying to get them to dismiss the most serious charges b/c they were willing to do that if you were going to take a deal where you had to plead no contest. I asked the new DA to dismiss the attempted murder b/c it was an accident.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Mar 3, 2023, 9:39 AMsubject: RE: Re:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
I gave you a copy of the CALCRIM instruction for the hit and run charge and attempted murder charge. I also went over it with you. That’s how we are dealing with it. By negating one of the elements. Have a good weekend Michael.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Mar 3, 2023, 9:49 AMsubject: Re: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
I'll have to represent myself at trial. That's a promise.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>to: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>date: Mar 3, 2023, 9:57 AMsubject: RE: Re:mailed-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsigned-by: pubdef.lacounty.govsecurity: Standard encryption (TLS)
That is your constitutional right to do so Michael.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
from: Mistah Wilson <michael.taylor.workforce@gmail.com>to: Christian Le <CLe@pubdef.lacounty.gov>date: Mar 3, 2023, 10:26 AMsubject: Re: Re:mailed-by: gmail.com
This tha bullshit I'm talking about.
You gon tell me it's my constitutional right to represent myself yet you don't even acknowledge my constitutional right to EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
You're fucking fired, my friend.
The Daroca-Bell Dossier
- Exhibit #1 "Christian Le Acknowledges Right to Self Representation But Not The Right To Equal Protection" (August 18th, 2022 thru March 3rd, 2023)
- Exhibit #2 "Christian Le Passes Representation Off To Noah Cox" (March 24th, 2023 thru June 2nd, 2023)
- Exhibit #3 "Daroca-Bell Resists Equal Protection Rights of Client Michael Taylor" (June 12th, 2023 thru August 11th, 2023)
- Exhibit #4 "Defendant Michael Taylor Perceives Public Defender Resistance To Equal Protection As Hostility" (August 11th, 2023 thru August 18th, 2023)
- Exhibit #5 "Daroca-Bell Defies Client Objectives Concerning Equal Protection" (August 21st, 2023 thru August 23rd, 2023)
- Exhibit #6 "Daroca-Bell Rhetorically Uses RJA To Circumvent Equal Protection Argument" (August 24th, 2023 thru September 12th, 2023)
- Exhibit #7 "Daroca-Bell Uses Mental Health Diversion Pursuant To PC 1001.36 To Bait Client Into Competency Proceedings" (September 12th, 2023 thru October 5th, 2023)
- Exhibit #8 "Daroca-Bell Makes Equal Protection Contingent Upon Submission to Mental Health Diversion" (October 10th, 2023 thru October 13th, 2023)
- Exhibit #9 "Daroca-Bell Arranges Out-Of-State Telephonic Psych Eval In Breach of PSYPACT + Discourages Defendant's Complaint to Commission on Judicial Performance" (October 13th, 2023 thru November 16th, 2023)
- Exhibit #10 "Daroca-Bell Throws Tantrum In Client Meeting and Advises Client Not To File Police Report Over Alleged Victim's Threats of Violence" (December 4th, 2023 thru December 12th, 2023)
- Exhibit #11 "Daroca-Bell Pathologizes Client's Religious Beliefs In Privilege Breach, Repurposes Diversion Evaluation Into Competency Assessment In Violation Of Court Order" (January 9th, 2024 thru February 14th, 2024)
Comments
Post a Comment